Poznan, Poland

Clinical Research Center Medic-R

Urinary Bladder Cancer

Enfortumab

Cisplatin

Pembrolizumab

Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD)

condition

allSponsorName

Astellas

Seagen

gender

Male

Female

overallStatus

Recruiting

Not yet recruiting

Active, not recruiting

Enrolling by invitation

Completed

Terminated

Withdrawn

Suspended

Unknown

type

Interventional

Observational

Expanded Access

phase

Early Phase 1

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 4

Not Applicable

funderTypes

Industry

Other U.S. Federal agency

All others

ageGroup

Child (birth-17)

Adult (18-64)

Older Adult (65+)

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy \[gemcitabine plus cisplatin\] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The primary hypothesis is perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B).

Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-eligible Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) (MK-3475-B15/ KEYNOTE-B15 / EV-304)

Clinical Research Center Medic-R | Poznan, Poland

Site insights

Work at this site?

Active trials

Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-eligible Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) (MK-3475-B15/ KEYNOTE-B15 / EV-304)

Trial sponsors