Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
People who are infected with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have a great chance of being cured of the infection when they are treated with sofosbuvir. However, in some instances, treatment with sofosbuvir-containing therapy does not work. It is not known if people respond to retreatment with sofosbuvir, after it did not work the first time. There is an important need to understand retreatment options in those instances. This clinical trial was done to study the response to two different regimens, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin, and to see if they are safe and well-tolerated in HCV-infected persons whose previous treatment with sofosbuvir had failed.
Full description
There is a pressing need to understand appropriate retreatment options for HCV-infected patients who fail direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimens. To date, over 100,000 prescriptions have been written for SOF. Recent data indicate that SOF-based treatment defined as SOF/RBV, SOF/pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)/RBV or SOF/simeprevir (SIM) +/- RBV have led to treatment response of 70-92% in HCV genotype (GT) 1 patients, depending on the regimen used and presence of liver cirrhosis. Thus, there is a growing number of individuals who have failed SOF-based regimens and are in need of a retreatment strategy, the majority of which are anticipated to be HCV GT1, given the US distribution of genotypes. There are no data to inform retreatment strategies for HIV-infected individuals with SOF failure, who have traditionally represented a harder to treat group and are impacted by DAA-antiretroviral (ARV) interactions.
This was a phase II retreatment study of HCV GT1 and HIV coinfected participants who had previous HCV virologic failure on a SOF-based regimen. Participants were randomized to one of two treatment arms: 12 weeks of LDV/SOF with weight-based RBV (Arm A) or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF alone (Arm B). The targeted sample size was 40, 20 participants in each arm.
Post-entry, the study visits were scheduled at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 after study entry (with week 16, 20, 24 visits limited to those on the 24-week regimen), and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation. The total study duration was 36 weeks in Arm A and 48 weeks in Arm B. At each visit, a physical examination and blood collection were conducted. HCV RNA was tested at each visit. For female participants of reproductive potential, pregnancy tests were done. At on-treatment visits, participants also completed an HCV treatment adherence questionnaire. Urinalysis was conducted at all on-treatment visits and at 4 weeks post treatment. At select visits, plasma, whole blood, urine and dried blood spots were collected.
The study was randomized because there was clinical equipoise on the benefits and drawbacks in the two study arms. The study was not designed to be powered for comparisons between the randomized study arms, and no formal statistical comparisons were conducted. The primary analysis was conducted as a single-arm analysis for each regimen.
The study experienced enrollment difficulties due to the small number of HCV treatment failures from select SOF-based regimens who would be eligible for this study, and closed to accrual prematurely. The participants enrolled remained on study until completion of follow-up.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
7 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal