ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics

R

Rio de Janeiro State University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Bimaxillary Protrusion
Malocclusion, Angle Class I
Orthodontic Space Closure

Treatments

Procedure: En masse anterior teeth retraction
Procedure: Two-Step Retraction

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03903575
04186818.2.0000.5259

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to compare en masse (EM) and two-step anterior teeth retraction (TSR) evaluated by means of three-dimensional images superimposition. Thirty-two adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion planed for treatment with four first premolar extractions will be enrolled. All patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either EM (n=16) group or the TSR (n=16) group. Cone bean computed tomography will be taken before and after anterior retraction. A blind observer will construct separate 3D models for maxillary and mandibular surfaces using the anterior cranial fossa to register models of before and after space closing. Quantitative assessment of posterior anchorage loss and amount of anterior teeth retraction are the main outcomes. The secondary outcomes are the inclination of the molars, canines and incisors.

Enrollment

32 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Angle Class I malocclusion;
  • Bimaxillary protrusion;
  • Convex profile;
  • All natural teeth present in the mouth;
  • Absence of crowding or with negative discrepancy up to 4mm;
  • Absence of vertical and transverse occlusal problems;
  • Good oral health;
  • Good general health.

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of time to attend consultations;
  • Patients with severe systemic and psychological illness;
  • Patients with parafunction (bruxism), reflux or eating disorders;
  • Presence of periodontal disease;

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

32 participants in 2 patient groups

En Masse Retraction
Experimental group
Description:
Group treated by retracting the six anterior teeth simultaneously.
Treatment:
Procedure: En masse anterior teeth retraction
Two-Step Retraction
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group treated by retracting the canines incisors in two different steps.
Treatment:
Procedure: Two-Step Retraction

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Flavia Artese, PhD; Sergio Caetano, MSc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems