Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Research Title:A study on 3D printing-assisted platelet-rich plasma combined with autologous periosteum-bone grafting in the treatment of knee cartilage injury Objectives:(1) To evaluate the accuracy of cartilage damage repair by measuring the chimerism and surface curvature matching degree of 3D printing reconstruction. (2) 3D printing assisted platelerichplasma (PRP) combined with autologous periosteumBone grafting in patients with knee cartilage injury was evaluated for functional and imaging scores to evaluate the clinical effect and cartilage repair effect.
Design Type:Prospective randomized controlled trial Research Objects:Unilateral knee cartilage injury area>2CM2, international cartilagerepair society (ICRS) grade 3-4 patients Sample size: 60 cases (30 patients with 3D printing-assisted autologous periosteum-bone grafting, 3D printing-assisted PRP combined with autologous periosteum.) - 30 patients with bone grafting).Selection Criteria:(1) Age 18~65 years old; (2) The body mass index (BMI) is 18~30kg/m2 ； (3) Knee cartilage injury confirmed by imaging examination, knee cartilage injury 2>cm2, ICRS grade 3-4; (4) There is no obvious abnormality in the lower limb force line; (5) No other drug injection or surgical treatment has been performed locally in the knee joint in the past 1 year.
Observation indicators:(1) Clinical function(2) Imaging evaluation: Bilateral knee MRI examination was performed on the second day after surgery Statistical analysis methods:SPSS software was used for data analysis.
Full description
Research Title:A study on 3D printing-assisted platelet-rich plasma combined with autologous periosteum-bone grafting in the treatment of knee cartilage injury Objectives:(1) To evaluate the accuracy of cartilage damage repair by measuring the chimerism and surface curvature matching degree of 3D printing reconstruction. (2) 3D printing assisted platelerichplasma (PRP) combined with autologous periosteumBone grafting in patients with knee cartilage injury was evaluated for functional and imaging scores to evaluate the clinical effect and cartilage repair effect.
Design Type:Prospective randomized controlled trial Research Objects:Unilateral knee cartilage injury area>2CM2, international cartilagerepair society (ICRS) grade 3-4 patients Sample size: 60 cases (30 patients with 3D printing-assisted autologous periosteum-bone grafting, 3D printing-assisted PRP combined with autologous periosteum.) - 30 patients with bone grafting).Selection Criteria:(1) Age 18~65 years old; (2) The body mass index (BMI) is 18~30kg/m2 ； (3) Knee cartilage injury confirmed by imaging examination, knee cartilage injury 2>cm2, ICRS grade 3-4; (4) There is no obvious abnormality in the lower limb force line; (5) No other drug injection or surgical treatment has been performed locally in the knee joint in the past 1 year.
Observation indicators:(1) Clinical function: Knee joint obtained by outpatient follow-up, written questionnaires, or by telephone by trained medical professionals before surgery and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery Lysholm score, Tegner exercise ability score, and pain numeric score were used to assess the improvement of symptoms and function. (2) Imaging evaluation: Bilateral knee MRI examination was performed on the second day after surgery, and the anatomical reconstruction was evaluated by mirror technology, including the chimerism of the bone bone interface between the graft and the host bone, and the match of the surface curvature of the graft and the recipient area. Magnetic resonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue observation (magneticresonanceobservationofcartilagerepairtissue, MOCART) scoring method scored MRI before surgery and 1 year after surgery to evaluate cartilage repair.
Statistical analysis methods:SPSS software was used for data analysis. The continuous data were expressed in (±s), and the normality test was performed, and the SNK test was used for comparison between groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparison of time data before and after intervention within the group, and paired sample f test was used for comparison at two time points. If the data does not meet the normal distribution, the logarithmic transformation is analyzed again. The X2 test was used for the counting data. P<0.05 was a statistically significant difference.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal