ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Clinical Trial for Self-Injurious Behavior

H

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Self-Injurious Behavior

Treatments

Behavioral: Combination Treatment
Behavioral: Noncontingent Reinforcement (NCR)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03995966
IRB00179539

Details and patient eligibility

About

At least one quarter of the 18 million persons in the US with intellectual and developmental disabilities engage in self-injurious behavior (SIB), which can result in injuries, disfigurement, and loss of function (e.g., blindness). SIB that persists in the absence of social reinforcement has been referred to as automatically maintained SIB (ASIB). Research has shown that the sensitivity of ASIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is identifiable in a standardized assessment, predicts response to treatment, and provides a quantifiable basis for subtyping ASIB. This research has also identified two subtypes that are highly resistant to behavioral treatment using reinforcement alone, necessitating the use of protective equipment and other procedures to minimize injury. The proposed study is a clinical trial that will allow systematic comparison of the effectiveness of two behavioral treatments targeting treatment-resistant subtypes of ASIB.

Full description

Research shows that automatically maintained self-injurious behavior (ASIB) is comprised of treatment-responsive (Subtype 1) and treatment-resistant subtypes (Subtypes 2 and 3). The primary objective of the clinical trial is to compare two behavioral treatments for the treatment-resistant subtypes of ASIB: Subtypes 2 and 3. Noncontingent Reinforcement (NCR) with competing stimuli (toys that reduce occurrence of SIB) is widely used, but its outcomes are not optimal for most cases with Subtype-2 and -3 ASIB. Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) includes two phases: 1) Pre-Treatment Assessment to identify competing stimuli and 2) NCR Treatment. Combination Treatment (CT) is based on the same principles as NCR (reinforcer competition), but increases the amount and varies the sources of alternative reinforcement to more effectively reduce ASIB and self-restraint. CT involves the use of competing stimuli, competing tasks (activities that reduce SIB), and self-control training to reduce self-restraint or teach alternative, more adaptive forms of self-control. CT includes three phases: 1) Pre-Treatment Assessments, 2) Intensive Training, and 3) Combination Treatment. Pre-Treatment Assessments will identify competing stimuli, tasks, and self-control equipment; and Intensive Training will strengthen skills needed to fully access available reinforcement to compete with ASIB, and establish self-control skills to replace debilitating self-restraint. Following the Intensive Training phase, CT combines noncontingent access to competing stimuli with differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) to reinforce engagement with competing tasks, and use of alternative self-control equipment.

Each study participant will be randomly assigned to first receive either NCR or CT using randomly permuted block randomization, stratified by subtype. Each approach includes more than one phase, but both end with a treatment phase. If the first treatment applied is ineffective, based on defined criteria (including the level of improvement and number of treatment sessions), a 3-day washout period will follow where no treatment is applied, and then the second approach will be initiated culminating in the application of that treatment (either NCR or CT).

Following a demonstration of treatment efficacy (for either the first or second treatment that is applied), any additional non-reinforcement treatment components that were added will be withdrawn to determine whether those components remain necessary. If a strong treatment effect does not maintain, the additional components will be reapplied. Treatment generalization will be initiated, and if the effects are maintained the trial will end.

If the first treatment that is applied is effective, that treatment will continue to be applied and generalization will be conducted (and the participant will not crossover to the other treatment approach).

Enrollment

16 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

4 to 25 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals with intellectual disabilities
  • Admitted to the Neurobehavioral Unit Inpatient program at the Kennedy Krieger Institute
  • Between the ages of 4 to 25 years
  • Exhibits either Subtype 2 or 3 automatically maintained self-injurious behavior

Exclusion criteria

  • Children in foster care
  • Non-English speakers
  • Individuals with a medical condition that could interfere with participation, or place an individual at increased risk

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

16 participants in 2 patient groups

Subtype 2 Automatically Maintained SIB
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Noncontingent Reinforcement (NCR)
Behavioral: Combination Treatment
Subtype 3 Automatically Maintained SIB
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Noncontingent Reinforcement (NCR)
Behavioral: Combination Treatment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems