Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. It has a negative impact on the cognitive and sensorimotor functions. Motor recovery becomes essential in rehabilitation phase to make the patient independent in activities of daily living along with improved lower extremity function, balance and gait. Studies show that both EMG Biofeedback therapy and Bobath therapy is effective in improving lower extremity function. Out of those studies, to the best of the investigators knowledge, no study has been conducted to find out the efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in stroke patients. Therefore the purpose of the study is to find out the comparative efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in patients with stroke.
Full description
Purpose of the Study:
There are studies available in which EMG Biofeedback therapy significantly improves lower extremity functions. Bobath therapy has also shown significant effect in recovery of lower extremity functions after stroke. Out of those studies, to the best of the investigators knowledge, no study has been conducted to find the comparative efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in Indian population with stroke patients.
Therefore, the purpose of the study is to find out the comparative efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in patients with stroke.
Aim and Objectives:
Aim:
To find out the comparative efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in patients with stroke.
Objectives:
Hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
There is no statistically significant difference between the efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in patients with stroke.
Alternative Hypothesis:
There is statistically significant difference between the efficacy of EMG Biofeedback therapy along with Bobath therapy and Bobath therapy alone on lower extremity functions, balance and gait in patients with stroke.
Study Variables:
Independent Variables:
Dependent Variables:
Procedure:
Approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) will be taken before commencement of the study. All patients diagnosed with hemiplegic stroke referred from Assessment Clinic of NILD to the Department of Physiotherapy will be approached with the study proposal. Minimum of 30 patients with hemiplegic stroke will be included after proper assessment and screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be explained in details about the study in their most communicable language. Written informed consent in their preferred language will be obtained from the patients agreeing to participate. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups using block randomization method by computer generated random blocks. The demographic data and the outcome measures data will be collected from each patient for lower extremity function by Lower Extremity Subscale of Fugl Meyer Assessment [FMA], balance by Timed Up and Go Test [TUG] and gait by 10-meter Walk Test [10mWT] at baseline and at the end of four weeks of intervention. In Group-A (n≥15) EMG Biofeedback therapy and Bobath therapy will be given for 16 sessions (4 sessions per week for 4 weeks). In Group- B (n≥15) only Bobath therapy will be given for 16 sessions (4 sessions per week for 4 weeks). Home exercise program will be given in both groups.
Rescue medications duly prescribed by physician will be continued along with the physiotherapeutic approach in both the groups during the study.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
30 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Pravin Kumar, MPT; Sanlap Kundu, BPT
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal