ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Cognitive-behavioral Intervention of Rumination for Perfectionists

U

Université Catholique de Louvain

Status

Completed

Conditions

Rumination - Thoughts
Perfectionism
Depression
Anxiety

Treatments

Behavioral: A cognitive-behavioral approach of rumination as intervention for overgeneral mode of processing in perfectionism

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05385289
2022/17JAN/016

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to investigate the mediating role of rumination in the relationship between perfectionism and psychological distress, by proposing a cognitive-behavioral intervention targeting rumination. This intervention aims at decreasing - or even neutralizing - the effect of the mediator and then examining how this decrease impacts the relationship between perfectionism and psychological distress.

A randomized, concurrent, multiple-baseline single-case design will be applied.

Full description

Perfectionism is defined as "exceedingly high standards of performance accompanied by critical evaluations of oneself and others and a fear of negative social evaluation if not perfect". Factorial analyses of the two main perfectionism scales have identified two overarching dimensions: Perfectionistic Strivings and Perfectionistic Concerns. The perfectionistic concerns dimension is generally associated with negative outcomes and psychopathology, while perfectionistic strivings have been found to yield both positive outcomes and negative outcomes.

Perfectionism is a central transdiagnostic phenomenon involved in the maintenance of multiple psychological disorders (e.g., anorexia nervosa, obsessive compulsive disorder, chronic fatigue, and depression). After decades of research focusing on scales development or relying exclusively on correlational studies, the experimental investigation of the processes underlying perfectionism is just emerging. On a theoretical basis, two processes related to emotional information processing seem particularly relevant: rumination and autobiographical memory. The objective of this study is to investigate with a randomized, concurrent, multiple-baseline single-case design the contribution of these processes to perfectionists' psychological vulnerability.

Rumination is defined as a mental process characterized by repetitive, prolonged, and recurrent thinking about one's concerns and one's experience. The control theory suggests that individuals engage in rumination when perceiving a discrepancy between their goals and their current condition, and stay in this mode of thinking until the goal is either attained or abandoned. Based on this theoretical background, recent research suggests that rumination could be one of the processes explaining the perfectionistic vulnerability to psychological distress, by perseveringly focusing on the discrepancy between high and demanding standards and the actual performance. However, only few study has experimentally manipulated this process, thus precluding from any causal inference.

Autobiographical memories are "memories about personal experiences that go beyond the mere factual description of the event to include personal beliefs, emotions, and thoughts". One feature of those memories is the specificity level defined as "the extent to which retrieved autobiographical memories are specific or not (i.e., memory of a particular event that happened at a particular time and place that lasted no more than one day). Difficulty with retrieving such specific memories is called overgeneral autobiographical memory".

The perfectionism cognition theory aims to clarify how autobiographical memory and working memory might be affected by perfectionist tendencies. It especially postulates retroactive loops between (a) repetitive thinking, (b) an overdeveloped memory for mistakes, failures, and stressful experiences, and (c) a hypervigilance and cognitive bias toward related cues that signal the possibility of failure, mistakes, and negative social evaluation. These authors suggested that perfectionists are characterized by deficits in attentional capacity and working memory during times of stress. This promising cognitive approach has partially been supported. For example, a recent meta-analysis states that perseverative cognitions (i.e., worry and rumination) mediate the relationship between perfectionism and distress in non-clinical samples. However, empirical evidence of an experimental nature is still needed, in particular for the postulated autobiographical memory and working memory biases.

To overcome those limitations, the present study will manipulate rumination with a clinical intervention, to block its mediational role on the relationship between perfectionism and psychological distress (here operationalized by mood state and anxio-depressive symptoms). Moreover, this study aims to go further than identifying a true mediator: its aims to explain the mechanism "through which change come about", namely through a concreteness training to overcome overgeneral mode of processing. Indeed, even if the main focus of the study is to identify mediators that may statistically account for the relationship between perfectionism and psychological distress, a ideal purpose is to propose a therapeutic intervention that may target mechanisms of change underlying hypothesized mediator.

Enrollment

13 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Being native French speakers
  • Reporting significant levels of (1) perfectionism, (2) abstract and evaluative repetitive thinking, and (3) anxio-depressive symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

  • Being involved in a therapeutic treatment.
  • Being under 18 years old.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

13 participants in 2 patient groups

First wave with 6 participants
Experimental group
Description:
Once selected, an individual online information session will be scheduled with each selected participant to explain the project and its practical implications. At this time, six of the twelve participants will be provided a link to complete online measures as the A-baseline phase, to constitute their own non-intervention control condition on the target behavior (i.e., rumination) and on positive and negative emotions. The other six participants will be entered into a 3-week waiting list period with a sequential introduction, to provide another non-intervention control condition. The A-baseline phase length will include at least 5 measures and most 10 measures, resulting in 10 potential starting point for the B-experimental phase. This range will be determined to estimate autocorrelation and its associated bias.
Treatment:
Behavioral: A cognitive-behavioral approach of rumination as intervention for overgeneral mode of processing in perfectionism
Second wave with 6 other participants
Experimental group
Description:
After three weeks, the six participants on the waiting list will also begin the same A-baseline phase as the six participants of the first wave.
Treatment:
Behavioral: A cognitive-behavioral approach of rumination as intervention for overgeneral mode of processing in perfectionism

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems