Status
Conditions
About
This study serves as a supplemental investigation to the randomized controlled SCAN-AID study (NCT0632187). This study will evaluate and compare the fetal growth estimation outcomes of AI-supported groups, expert sonographers, and control groups using a secondary AI predictive model.
Full description
The goal of this study is to compare the effects of two distinct AI methods on fetal ultrasound diagnostic accuracy. It serves as a supplementary investigation to the SCAN-AID study (NCT NCT06232187). This study aims will compare the diagnostic accuracy of two types of AI methods.
From the SCAN-AID study ultrasound novices were randomized into one of three groups with different levels of AI support: control group, AI feedback group 1 where the participants are presented with basic black box AI feedback, and AI feedback group 2 where the participants are presented with a more detailed explainable AI feedback. All the participants are tasked to perform an ultrasound fetal weight estimation (EFW) on pregnant women at gestational age 30-37. The outcomes were than compared to the expert sonographers measurements.
In this study an operator independent AI method that predicts the fetal weight is used on the SCAN-AID ultrasound examinations. .
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Pregnant women:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
150 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mary L Ngo; Martin Tolsgaard
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal