ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Comparative Study of an Innovative 3-lead Wireless Water Resistant Holter System and a Conventional Holter System

H

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia

Treatments

Device: A conventional device
Device: An innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant Holter device

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04723355
40422220.1.0000.5462

Details and patient eligibility

About

Holter monitoring is one of the most widely used diagnostic methods to detect cardiac arrhythmias. Newer Holter monitors may provide some advantages over the more traditional ones. This study will compare the findings of a Holter exam using an innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant device with a conventional device.

Full description

The 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography, commonly known as Holter monitoring, is a diagnostic method to correlate clinical symptoms with cardiac arrhythmias. The Holter monitor records electrical signals from the heart using electrodes attached to the chest, which are connected via cables to a digital recorder. In addition to the device to record the cardiac electrical signals, the Holter system also has a software for review and analysis of the record. The software of the Holter system has an integrated automatic analysis process to detect different sorts of heart beats, rhythms, etc, which are then validated by a technician and a physician. The success of the automatic analysis depends of the quality of the captured electrical signals, which are dependent on the appropriate attachment of the electrodes/cables to the patient body. Therefore, inappropriately attached electrodes/cables can result in electromagnetic disturbance that can interfere with the ECG signal, resulting in a very noisy record that is hard to be analysed.

Newer Holter systems that eliminate the cables and attach the recorder directly to the electrodes positioned in the patient´s chest might reduce the electromagnetic disturbance in the ECG signal capture and, therefore, improve the quality of the exam.

This study will compare the findings of a Holter exam using an innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant device with a conventional device.

Enrollment

231 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Any individual who has an indication of 24 hours Holter monitoring and is referred to the arrhythmia clinic of the Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to provide written informed consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

231 participants in 1 patient group

Holter device
Experimental group
Description:
In this single arm of the study, the participant will use 2 Holter systems simultaneously for 24 hours, an innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant device and a conventional device.
Treatment:
Device: An innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant Holter device
Device: A conventional device

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems