ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Comparison of Different Ventilation Strategies in Infants Using the PLMA™

Wake Forest University (WFU) logo

Wake Forest University (WFU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ventilation

Treatments

Device: Pressure support ventilation
Other: Spontaneous ventilation
Device: Pressure control ventilation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03235817
IRB00011814

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this research study is to compare difference between breathing by oneself or with the partial help from an anesthesia machine in infants under general anesthesia.

Hypothesis: Infants undergoing general anesthesia with a PLMA™ will be better ventilated (improved breathing) with the help of the breathing machine versus breathing on their own.

Full description

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a breathing device that sits above the vocal cords and allows the patient to breathe in and out adequately under general anesthesia (GA). The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA™) is a specialized type of LMA with a design that permits the delivery of higher pressures to help the patient breathe in and out (ventilate) and also contains a channel to suction the stomach.

Infants under GA may breathe through a PLMA in different ways. Spontaneous ventilation consists of the infants breathing on their own through a PLMA™. Pressure support ventilation allows the patient to breathe on their own with additional help from the anesthesia machine. Pressure control ventilation allows the patient to breathe with the help of an anesthesia machine.

An infant undergoing surgery requires a deep level of general anesthesia which negatively affects their ability to ventilate. Thus, infants may not breathe in oxygen and carbon dioxide out adequately at this level of anesthesia and it may be beneficial to provide some level of support to enhance carbon dioxide exchange and to avoid hypoventilation.

This study will attempt to determine whether pressure support ventilation improves ventilation in infants undergoing outpatient surgery.

Enrollment

39 patients

Sex

All

Ages

1 to 11 months old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical classification of 1 or 2
  2. Outpatient surgical procedures
  3. Surgical procedure anticipated to be < 90 minutes
  4. Subject age of 1 - 11 months (inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

  1. Inpatient- Such individuals may have underlying disease processes which puts them at an increased risk under general anesthesia for hypoventilation
  2. ASA physical classification of 3, 4 or E
  3. Premature infants or infants < 44 weeks post-conceptual age
  4. Risk of aspiration- Intubation with an endotracheal tube may be required for general anesthesia.
  5. Patients with malignant hyperthermia or family history of malignant hyperthermia- Administration of inhalational agents for general anesthesia is contraindicated.
  6. Patients with tracheostomies- The individual's airway is already established and PLMA™ placement is not required.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

39 participants in 3 patient groups

Spontaneous ventilation
Experimental group
Treatment:
Other: Spontaneous ventilation
Pressure support ventilation
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Pressure support ventilation
Pressure control ventilation
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Pressure control ventilation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems