A Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Ultrasonic Dissection Assisted Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy (MC-UsD)

Kuopio University Hospital

Status: Completed

Conditions: Postoperative Pain

Treatments: Procedure: Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01723540

KUH5204520

Details and patient eligibility

About

Minilaparatomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) is rarely considered and therefore we investigate here the contributions of UsD in early recovery.

Enrollment: 88 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:- Uncomplicted symptomatic cholelithiasis cholecystitis confirmed by ultrasoud

• ASA physical status 1-3
• Body mass index 18-30
• AGE 18 - 75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancy or lactating
• common bile-duct stones
• acute cholecystitis
• previous upper abdominal operation
• Chirrosis
• Renal disease
• Pancreatitis
• ASA 4-5
• Participation of any other clinical trial within 30 days before the start of the screening period
• History of uncontrolled cardiovascular, epileptic disorder, psychosis.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

88 participants in 2 patient groups

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic scissors

Experimental group

Description:

Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy

Treatment:

Procedure: Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Active Comparator group

Description:

Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy

Treatment:

Procedure: Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy