Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The current postpartum care model of a single visit 4-6 weeks after delivery does not optimally address contraceptive needs. By this visit, many women have resumed sexual activity, potentially putting them at risk for unintended and rapid repeat pregnancy. In addition, many women with pregnancy-related Medicaid lose insurance coverage at this time, making it difficult to obtain long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) if desired. Therefore, an earlier postpartum visit may remove barriers to improve access to LARC thereby, reducing unintended and rapid repeat pregnancy. Our primary objective is to determine whether an additional 3-week postpartum visit, compared to usual postpartum care, will affect the initiation of LARC by 6 weeks postpartum.
Full description
Our primary objective is to determine whether an additional 3-week postpartum visit, compared to usual postpartum care, will affect the initiation of LARC by 6 weeks postpartum. Our secondary outcomes include: 1) desired method of postpartum contraception; 2) continuation and satisfaction with contraception; and 3) incidence of rapid repeat and unintended pregnancy at 12 months. We will also measure attendance and satisfaction with 3- compared to 6-week postpartum visits.We will perform a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Women will be randomized to routine postpartum follow-up compared to two postpartum visits; one at 3 weeks and one at 6 weeks, with initiation of contraception at the 3-week visit as indicated. Women will be recruited from the postpartum service of Barnes-Jewish Hospital and all women will receive structured comprehensive counseling (adapted from the CHOICE Project Model) prior to discharge from the hospital. Postpartum visits will occur at our outpatient ambulatory clinic sites. Participants will complete in-person surveys at baseline and at each visit, and telephone surveys at 6- and 12-months postpartum. Planned recruitment will be 200 women based on a 2-fold increase in LARC initiation in the intervention group compared to control group (40% vs. 20% initiation rate).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
200 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal