ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Obese Patients (Ovesion)

A

AnestesiaR

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Ventilation
Obesity
Endotracheal Intubation
Desaturation

Treatments

Device: orotracheal intubation Macintosh Laryngoscope
Device: orotracheal intubation Totaltrack VLM

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03106974
totaltrackeca01

Details and patient eligibility

About

Airway management in obese patients has to consider that mask ventilation (DMV) risk is increased and difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) risk may be increased too.

In obese patients, is essential to prevent early arterial oxygen desaturation related to a reduced functional residual capacity (FRC), atelectasis formation during anesthetic induction and after tracheal intubation, because oxygenation maintenance is the cornerstone of the airway management of the obese patient.

Endotracheal intubation is usually required to allow unrestricted surgical approach. The Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard method. However, sometimes this technique is ineffective and poorly tolerated by the obese patient.

The Totaltrack™ (MedComflow S.A., Barcelona, Spain) is a hybrid device, between a supraglottic airway and a videolaryngoscope with an anatomically shaped blade. It allows fibreoptic visualization of the larynx for tracheal intubation and was developed to aid both ventilation and tracheal intubation, at the time of anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway management.

However, despite its use in clinical practice, there are no comparative studies regarding direct laryngoscopy in obese patients.

Enrollment

1,440 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI > 30.
  • ASA 1-3
  • Scheduled surgeries that require orotracheal intubation.
  • General anesthesia with neuromuscular relaxation before intubation.
  • Patients who sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • ASA 4
  • Difficult airway already known.
  • Alterations of airway documented, with previous tracheostomy or involve anatomical alterations.
  • General anesthesia that not require orotracheal intubation or neuromuscular relaxation.
  • Symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux.
  • Lap-Band carrier.
  • Allergy medications to use.
  • Urgent surgery.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

1,440 participants in 2 patient groups

Macintosh Laryngoscope
Active Comparator group
Description:
orotracheal intubation (OTI) with Macintosh Laryngoscope Direct laryngoscopy
Treatment:
Device: orotracheal intubation Macintosh Laryngoscope
Totaltrack VLM
Active Comparator group
Description:
orotracheal intubation (OTI) with Totaltrack VlM Indirect laryngoscopy
Treatment:
Device: orotracheal intubation Totaltrack VLM

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Eugenio D. Martinez Hurtado, M.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems