ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip Resurfacing

Zimmer Biomet logo

Zimmer Biomet

Status

Completed

Conditions

Arthritis
Avascular Necrosis

Treatments

Procedure: Anterolateral approach
Procedure: Posterior approach
Device: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT00750984
BMETEU.CR.EU9

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares the posterior approach to the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Full description

Theoretical considerations of RECAP procedures through anterolateral trochanteric osteotomy:

  • Less bone resection, less complicated revision surgery.
  • Reduced stress shielding of the femur.
  • Lower incidence of hip dislocations.
  • Walking function improved by change in mobilisation regime and operative technique.
  • Risk of femoral neck fracture is reduced by preoperative measurement of bone density.
  • Risk of avascular necrosis of the femoral head is reduced with the anterolateral approach preserving femoral head blood supply and preventing later failure of the implant.

Enrollment

49 patients

Sex

All

Ages

29 to 61 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary hip OA
  • Secondary hip OA due to mild and moderate acetabular dysplasia
  • Sufficient bone quality for cementless acetabular component
  • Suited for resurfacing of the femoral head (pre- and intraoperatively assessed)
  • >29 years
  • <61 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Neuromuscular or vascular diseases in affected leg
  • Patients found intra-operatively to be unsuited for a cementless acetabular component or cementing of the femoral component
  • Need of NSAID post-operatively
  • Fracture sequelae
  • Females at risk of pregnancy (no safe contraceptives)
  • Severe hip dysplasia
  • Sequelae from hip disease in childhood
  • Medicine with large effect on bone density (K-vitamin antagonists, loop-diuretic)
  • Alcoholism (females > 14 units per week, males > 21 units per week) AVN
  • Osteoporosis

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

49 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Experimental group
Description:
This arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
Treatment:
Device: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing
Procedure: Anterolateral approach
Device: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing
2
Active Comparator group
Description:
This arm utilizes the posterior approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.
Treatment:
Device: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing
Procedure: Posterior approach
Device: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems