ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance

A

Al-Azhar University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Dental Intrusion
Mandibular Rotation
ANB , SNA, SNB
Openbite Teeth | Teeth and Gum | Dental

Treatments

Biological: buccal miniscrew and TPA
Biological: vertical holding appliance

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05433051
807/220

Details and patient eligibility

About

this study is to compare the dental and skeletal changes caused by the intrusion of maxillary first molars buccal miniscrew and TPA versus vertical holding appliance using lateral cephalometry.

Enrollment

24 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

14 to 20 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suffering class I or II with AOB.
  • AOB ranged between 3-7 mm assessed from cephalometry.
  • Patients with excess in posterior dentoalveolar height according to Burrstone .
  • Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
  • Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Good quality of lateral cephalometry.

Exclusion criteria

  • Skeletal open bite
  • previous orthodontic treatment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

24 participants in 2 patient groups

Buccal miniscrews with TPA
Active Comparator group
Description:
active comparator double center
Treatment:
Biological: buccal miniscrew and TPA
vertical holding appliance
Active Comparator group
Description:
active comparator double center
Treatment:
Biological: vertical holding appliance

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems