ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Culturally-Based Palliative Care Tele-consult Program for Rural Southern Elders

The University of Alabama at Birmingham logo

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Neuro-Degenerative Disease
Stroke
Cardiac Disease
Pulmonary Disease
Renal Disease
Cancer
Hepatic Disease
Sepsis

Treatments

Other: Usual Care
Other: Active Intervention

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT03767517
IRB300002420
5R01NR017181-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
1R01NR017181-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at very high risk of not receiving appropriate care due to a lack of health professionals, long distances to treatment centers, and limited palliative care (PC) clinical expertise. Secondly, although culture strongly influences people's response to diagnosis, illness and treatment preferences, culturally-based care models are not currently available for most seriously-ill rural patients and their family caregivers. Lack of sensitivity to cultural differences may compromise PC for minority patients. The purpose of this study is to compare a culturally-based Tele-consult program to usual hospital care to determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program leads to lower symptom burden in hospitalized African American and White older adults with a life-limiting illness.

Full description

The triple threat of rural geography, racial inequities, and older age hinders access to high quality PC for a significant proportion of Americans. Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at very high risk of not receiving appropriate care due to a lack of health professionals, long distances to treatment centers, and limited PC clinical expertise. Although culture strongly influences people's response to diagnosis, illness and treatment preferences, culturally-based care models are not currently available for most seriously-ill rural patients and their family caregivers. Lack of sensitivity to cultural differences may compromise PC for minority patients. The two major public health consequences of these problems are:

  1. Access-Rural patients have sub-optimal or no access to PC. Despite significant nationwide growth, access to PC is grossly inadequate for the 60 million US citizens who live in rural or non-metropolitan areas. There is low PC use in rural and minority populations. As a result, rural patients experience significant suffering from uncontrolled symptoms that PC expertise could alleviate.
  2. Acceptability-Even when palliative and hospice services are available, African Americans (AA), compared to Whites (W) are more likely to receive medically-ineffective, poor quality care due to a culturally-insensitive health care system and mistrust of health care providers. Making culturally competent PC available for diverse underserved and rural Americans is a national priority.

This community-developed, culturally based Teleconsult Intervention specifically targets the gaps of PC access and acceptability. It was developed by and for rural, Deep South AA and W patients and providers, and uses state-of-the-art telehealth methods, to provide PC consultation to hospitalized seriously-ill patients and family. Using National Consensus Project guidelines, and the culturally-based, community-developed PC Tele-consult intervention, a remote PC expert conducts a comprehensive PC patient assessment, in collaboration with local providers. Following interdisciplinary PC team review, the remote clinician communicates recommendations. Two additional structured follow up contacts at Day 3 and 6 ensure care coordination and smooth transitions that enable patients to receive guideline concurrent PC in their communities.

Aims of the study and Hypotheses:

Primary Aim: Determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program leads to lower symptom burden in hospitalized AA and W older adults with a life-limiting illness.

Hypothesis 1: Intervention patient participants receiving a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program will experience lower symptom burden on Day 7 post-consultation.

Secondary Aim: Determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program results in higher patient and caregiver quality of life, care satisfaction, and lower caregiver burden at Day 7 post-consultation, and lower resource use (hospital readmission, emergency visits) 30-days post-discharge.

Hypothesis 2: Intervention participants and their caregivers receiving a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program will experience higher patient and caregiver quality of life, care satisfaction, lower caregiver burden at Day 7 post consultation, and lower resource use (e.g. hospital admission, emergency visits) at 30 days after discharge.

Exploratory Aim: Explore mediators and moderators of patient symptom and caregiver burden outcomes.

Enrollment

209 patients

Sex

All

Ages

55+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • AA or W;
  • 55 years old; has a condition which fits into one of 3 illness paradigms -cancer, chronic progressive, frailty.
  • Clinician answers "no" to question: "Would you be surprised if this person died in the next 12 months?"
  • Patient has a caregiver who has been involved in their care.
  • Able to complete baseline interviews

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to complete baseline interviews;
  • Currently receiving hospice care;
  • No family member/caregiver.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

209 participants in 2 patient groups

Active Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Usual Care + Tele-consult Intervention
Treatment:
Other: Active Intervention
Usual Care
Active Comparator group
Description:
Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted.
Treatment:
Other: Usual Care

Trial contacts and locations

4

Loading...

Central trial contact

Felicia Underwood, LICSW; Ronit Elk, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems