Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study with low-dose LSD comprised 2 substudies in healthy subjects. Subjects who met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria provided written informed consent. Part 1 was an open-label dose-escalation study in hallucinogen non-naïve subjects with significant prior experience with hallucinogens, during which each subject received a single dose of LSD: 50, 75, or 100 µg. Part 2 was a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, crossover study in hallucinogen naïve subjects with no prior experience with hallucinogens in the last 7 years, during which each subject was assigned to 1 of 8 cohorts and then randomly assigned to receive single doses of LSD 50 µg followed by 75 µg, or placebo followed by 75 µg, with dosing separated by at least 7 days. Subjects were followed up on the day after each dosing, and 1 week and 1 month after the last dose of study treatment. A total of 32 subjects were enrolled.
Full description
This study with low-dose LSD comprised 2 substudies in different populations of healthy subjects:
Part 1: an open-label dose-escalation study in hallucinogen non-naïve subjects. Part 2: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, crossover study in hallucinogen naïve subjects.
Part 1: Open-label, dose escalation study This part was performed in a population of healthy subjects with significant prior experience with hallucinogens. There was a screening period of up to 28 days. Following provision of informed consent and completion of all screening assessments, eligible subjects were assigned to the open-label dose-escalation group.
Following completion of baseline assessments, each subject received a single dose of LSD: 50, 75, or 100 µg. This dose range was selected for assessment based on extensive historical and clinical LSD research. Subjects knew they would receive the experimental drug but were blinded to the dose level received. Subjects were followed up on the day after dosing and at 1 week and 1 month after dosing.
During screening, baseline, treatment, and follow-up, subjects underwent a series of assessments. Included amongst these assessments were cognitive tasks that were administered at baseline before administration of LSD and subsequently during the study. The open-label study subjects also provided samples for PK analysis.
Part 2: Double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised, crossover study This part commenced following evaluation of the results from Part 1. It was performed in a population of healthy subjects with no prior experience with hallucinogens during the last 7 years. There was a screening period of up to 28 days. Following provision of informed consent and completion of all screening assessments, eligible subjects were assigned to 1 of 8 cohorts and then randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Cognitive assessments were administered at baseline before administration of the first dose and subsequently during the study.
Following completion of baseline assessments, subjects entered a 2 week treatment period: the experimental non-crossover group received 2 sequential escalating single doses of LSD administered at levels determined in Part 1 (50 µg followed by 75 µg, or placebo followed by 75 µg), with dosing separated by at least 7 days; the placebo controlled crossover group received placebo followed at least 7 days later by a single dose of 75 µg LSD, as determined in Part 1. Subjects were followed up on the day after each dosing, 1 week after the second dose, and at 1 month after the last dose of study treatment.
During screening, baseline, treatment and follow-up days, subjects underwent a series of assessments.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A. General Health
Subject had a presence or clinically relevant history of any psychiatric, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, hematological, lymphatic, neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, genitourinary, immunological, dermatological, connective tissue diseases or disorders, as judged by the investigator.
Subject had a resting blood pressure exceeding 140 mmHg (systolic) or 90 mmHg (diastolic), averaged across 4 assessments taken at least 1 minute apart on the same day.
Subject had a presence or relevant history of organic brain disorders (e.g., intracranial hypertension, aneurisms, impaired consciousness, lethargy, or brain tumour).
Subject had a relevant history of atopy, hypersensitivity, skin allergies, or allergic reactions to drugs.
Subject had a clinical laboratory test result outside the reference ranges of the testing laboratory and considered clinically significant by the investigator.
Subject was positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, or human immunodeficiency (HIV) virus I or II at screening.
Subject was a current smoker (i.e., had smoked within 1 month prior to the screening visit).
Subject had a medical history that would affect the subject's safety or the study endpoints.
Subject had used prescription drugs which might potentially interact with the pharmacokinetics of LSD or therapy within 14 days of first dosing, unless agreed as not clinically relevant by the PI and the Medical Monitor.
Subject had used over the counter (OTC) medication or therapy, including megadose vitamin therapy (but excluding routine vitamins) within 7 days of first dosing, unless agreed as not clinically relevant by the PI and the Medical Monitor.
Subject had donated or received any blood or blood products within the previous 3 months prior to first dosing.
Subject could not use a computer to complete simple tasks such as responding to an email.
Subject had used any investigational drug or participated in any clinical trial within 3 months of their first dosing.
Subject had a current sleep disorder.
Subject had a history of cataracts, active glaucoma or any other ophthalmic condition that could interfere with the eye blink assessment.
Subject had veins unsuitable for venepuncture and/or cannulation.
Subject had a corrected QT interval using Fridericia's correction >450 milliseconds.
Subject was unlikely to cooperate with the requirements of the study, in the opinion of the PI or designee.
Subject was pregnant or lactating
Exclusion Part 2 only: Subject had a history of drug abuse or dependence in the last 12 months, had current drug abuse or dependence or had a positive result for drugs of abuse and alcohol tests at screening or admission.
B. Psychiatric Health
Subject had a current or past history of meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition criteria for schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders (unless substance induced or due to a medical condition), bipolar I or II disorder, a major depressive episode, a manic or hypomanic episode, alcohol dependence or abuse (in the past 5 years), substance dependence and abuse (in the past 5 years), current panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, anorexia, bulimia or post-traumatic stress disorder
Subject had a first- or second-degree relative with schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders (unless substance-induced or due to a medical condition), or bipolar I or II disorder.
Subject was receiving chronic administration of tricyclic antidepressants or lithium or acute administration of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, haloperidol, serotonin reuptake inhibitors or monoamine oxidase inhibitors.
Subject was taking OTC doses of 5-hydroxytryptophan or St John's Wort or ayahuasca (which contains monoamine oxidase inhibitors in addition to dimethyltryptamine).
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
32 participants in 5 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal