ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Feasibility Study of Chemo-radiotherapy to Treat Operable Oesophageal Cancer (NeoSCOPE)

L

Lisette Nixon

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 2

Conditions

Oesophageal Cancer

Treatments

Drug: Carboplatin
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Drug: Capecitabine
Procedure: Surgery
Radiation: Radiotherapy
Drug: Paclitaxel

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01843829
2012/VCC/0009

Details and patient eligibility

About

About 7500 patients are diagnosed with oesophageal cancer each year in the UK of which less than a quarter have resectable disease at diagnosis. There is a general lack of consistency in the standard of care for patients across UK hospitals. Patients are either treated with a) chemotherapy followed by surgical removal of the tumour, or b) chemoradiotherapy followed by removal of the tumour by surgery, as part of their standard of care. Recent research supports the latter treatment, as chemoradiotherapy maybe more effective at shrinking the tumour and preventing the disease from spreading than taking chemotherapy alone. However, there is no definitive way of identifying which treatment is best without a clinical trial.

Evidence suggests that the effect of the chemoradiotherapy currently used as standard practice may be improved and the side effects reduced by using a different chemoradiotherapy combination. In this trial, eligible patients will receive 2 cycles of the same chemotherapy before being randomised to receive two different chemoradiotherapy regimens (carboplatin and paclitaxel verses oxaliplatin and capecitabine) both of which have shown promising results in previous studies. Patients will then have their tumour removed. The best chemoradiotherapy regimen will then be taken forward to a Phase III trial in which chemoradiotherapy will be compared with chemotherapy alone.

The efficacy of the regimens will be measured by counting the number of patients who i) remain free from cancer, ii)have local or distant spread of their cancer, iii) are successfully recruited and iv) experience toxicities. A specific set of toxicity criteria will be used to monitor any treatment induced side-effects and provide justification for any necessary dose modifications or withdrawal of treatment.

Enrollment

85 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed operable oesophageal cancer (adenocarcinoma)
  • Tumour must be staged as a T3, 4 or N1 (using TNM6 staging) or T3, T4a or N13 using TNM7 staging)
  • Maximum disease (Tumour plus nodes) length 8 cm staged with EUS and CT/PET
  • WHO performance status 01
  • Adequate haematological, renal, respiratory, cardiac and hepatic function
  • The patient has provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed operable oesophageal cancer (squamous cell carcinoma)

  • Uncontrolled angina pectoris, myocardial infarction within 6 months, heart failure, clinically significant uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, or any patient with a clinically significant abnormal ECG.

  • Patients with any previous treatment for oesophageal carcinoma.

  • Siewert type 3 oesophagogastric tumours.

  • T4 tumours invading contiguous structures other than diaphragm, crura or mediastinal pleura.

  • Patients with disease in any of the following areas on the CT scan, EUS or other staging investigation:

    1. Evidence of metastases in liver, lung, bone or other distant metastases.
    2. Abdominal para aortic lymphadenopathy >1cm diameter on CT or >6mm diameter on EUS.
    3. Invasion of tracheo-bronchial tree, aorta, pericardium or lung.
  • Lymphadenopathy encasing the coeliac axis (as described above, patients with single nodes lying anterior to the origin of the splenic artery and anterior to the origin of the coeliac axis are not excluded).

  • Any patient with a single significant medical condition which is thought likely to compromise his or her ability to tolerate any of the above therapies.

  • Specific contraindications to surgery, chemotherapeutic agents (including known allergies to chemotherapy) or radiotherapy.

  • Pregnant or lactating women and fertile women who will not be using adequate contraception during the trial.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

85 participants in 2 patient groups

Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Arm
Experimental group
Description:
2 cycles OxCap: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 Day 1 (IV infusion) Capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd Day 1- 21 (oral) then CRT: Paclitaxel 50mg/m2 Days 1,8,15,22,29 (IV infusion); Carboplatin AUC 2 Days 1,8,15,22,29 (IV infusion) XRT: 45 Gy in 25 fractions then surgery. All drugs will be sourced from local stock
Treatment:
Radiation: Radiotherapy
Drug: Paclitaxel
Procedure: Surgery
Drug: Carboplatin
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Drug: Capecitabine
Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine Arm
Experimental group
Description:
2 cycles OxCap: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 Day 1 (IV infusion) Capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd Day 1- 21 (oral) then CRT: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 Days 1, 15, 29 (IV infusion); Capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd (oral) only on days when receiving RT XRT: 45 Gy in 25 fractions\* then surgery. All drugs will be sourced from local stock
Treatment:
Radiation: Radiotherapy
Procedure: Surgery
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Drug: Capecitabine

Trial contacts and locations

12

Loading...

Central trial contact

Lisette Nixon

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems