ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Meta-analysis Comparing Toothbrushes on Plaque Removal and Gingival Health

Procter & Gamble (P&G) logo

Procter & Gamble (P&G)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Plaque
Gingivitis

Treatments

Device: Sonic electric toothbrush
Device: Oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush
Device: Manual toothbrush

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT05594004
2022BrushMetaAnalysis

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this analysis was to compare gingivitis- and plaque-reduction efficacy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to six months long evaluating oscillating-rotating, sonic, and manual toothbrushes

Enrollment

2,929 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Subjects were excluded from this study for the following reasons;

  • pregnancy,
  • rampant caries,
  • severe periodontitis,
  • at discretionary of the Principal Investigator.

Trial design

2,929 participants in 3 patient groups

Oscillating-Rotating electric toothbrush
Description:
Twice daily brushing
Treatment:
Device: Oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush
Sonic electric toothbrush
Description:
Twice daily brushing
Treatment:
Device: Sonic electric toothbrush
Manual toothbrush
Description:
Twice daily brushing
Treatment:
Device: Manual toothbrush

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems