ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Multicenter Trial of a Shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients Offered Implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators

University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver) logo

University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Heart Failure, Systolic
Heart Failure

Treatments

Other: Educational video and/or handout

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT03374891
1R01HL136403-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
17-1697

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators goal is to assess real-world effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDA) for high-risk decisions using the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) as a model.

Full description

The investigators propose the DECIDE-ICD trial: a type II effectiveness implementation hybrid trial of the investigators ICD PtDAs. The Investigators will use a 6-site stepped-wedge design, with implementation guided by normalization process theory® and evaluation guided by the RE-AIM framework.

The investigators aim to evaluate reach and effectiveness of the ICD PtDAs using a pragmatic, stepped-wedge design on decision quality (knowledge and value-concordance) and psychosocial outcomes.

  • Hypothesis 1a: PtDAs will reach over 50% of eligible patients.
  • Hypothesis 1b: ICD PtDAs will be effective in improving decision quality in real-world practice.
  • Hypothesis 1c: Better informed patients will have lower anxiety, higher rates of planning for the possibility of deactivation, and increased identification of a surrogate decision maker.

The investigators propose 3 a priori hypotheses:

  • The decision aids will have a differential effect on the decisions of participants by age (>= 70 years old vs <70 years old);
  • The decision aids will have a differential effect on the decisions of participants by heart failure type (non-ischemic vs ischemic);
  • The decision aids will have a differential effect on the decisions of participants by the type of device they are considering (ICD vs ICD replacement vs CRT-D).

Along with these hypotheses, we recognize that other important covariates exist, such as health literacy and education level.

Enrollment

790 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • English-speaking (videos and surveys have only been validated in English)
  • Patients have been offered a primary prevention ICD for initial implant, reimplantation, or CRT with defibrillation

Exclusion criteria

  • Prisoners

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

790 participants in 2 patient groups

Participants will fill out surveys
No Intervention group
Description:
These participants will fill out surveys in regard to their experiences, opinions, and knowledge of the defibrillator process.
Educational video and/or handout
Active Comparator group
Description:
These participants will receive an educational video and/or handout about the defibrillator process. Then they will fill out surveys in regard to their experiences, opinions, and knowledge of the defibrillator process.
Treatment:
Other: Educational video and/or handout

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems