Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study primary objective and endpoints are compare the efficacy of two products containing filgrastim, evaluating if the formulation produced by Eurofarma can be considered non-inferior to the reference product.
Full description
This study primary objective and endpoints are compare the efficacy of two products containing filgrastim, evaluating if the formulation produced by Eurofarma can be considered non-inferior to the reference product. For this, the study primary endpoint will be the rate of grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle of chemotherapy, according to the classification Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE).
The study secondary objectives will be to compare other efficacy aspects, as well as the tolerability of the two products containing filgrastim.
The secondary endpoints considered for the study will be:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Signed ICF;
Diagnosis confirmed by anatomic pathology examination (cytology or histopathology) of breast cancer;
Clinical or imaging confirmation of stage II to IV disease, according to the TNM classification;
Indication for chemotherapy with one of the eligible regimens, as long as the treatment in the first cycle is planned as full dose (without adjustments relative to the original regimen);
Performance status from 0 to 1 on the Zubrod scale;
No more than one previous chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic disease;
Proper organic functions, as indicated by all the following conditions:
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
220 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal