Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
India reports ~58,000 snakebite deaths/year, over 50% of global mortality. Clinical outcomes of antivenom may vary due to regional venom differences, delayed access to care, ineffective use of existing polyvalent antivenom. There is a need for an India-specific severity assessment tool because it improves risk stratification & clinical decisions ,guides antivenom use, supports rural healthcare infrastructure, reduces morbidity, mortality, and financial burden.
Existing scoring systems lack validation for Indian envenomation patterns. Variability in venom (both inter- and intra-species) leads to inconsistent clinical outcomes.Misapplication of non-Indian tools may cause: Inaccurate severity grading, inappropriate antivenom use, poor patient outcomes.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
● To determine the predictive accuracy of Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) done at the time of presentation in identifying syndrome specific core outcomes for snakebites.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
METHODOLOGY Study Duration: 18 months (Proposed)
n = Z₍₁-α/₂)2 x SN (100-SN ) / l2 x P = 220
INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
STUDY FLOW AND DATA MANAGEMENT
Study Flow:
Enrollment & Initial ED Assessment:
History, examination, bite documentation, SSS scoring Baseline labs as per institutional protocol
Monitoring & Follow-Up Timepoints:
T0: At presentation T+3h, +6h, +12h: Direct proforma, records review T+48h: Medical records Day 30 and Day 42 : Medical records & telephonic follow-up Outcomes Monitored: Neurotoxicity, haemotoxicity , coagulopathy, local damage, AKI, hypotension No interference with clinical care or treatment decisions.
DATA ANALYSIS PLAN:
Software: SPSS v29 Continuous variables are measured by using Mean+/-SD or median IQR Categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. ROC curve analysis for SSS and mSSS. Logistic regression for mortality. Subgroup and domain-wise analysis.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Ethics approval to be obtained. Informed consent will be ensured. Data anonymized and securely stored. No interference with patient treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
220 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Feba Susan Kurian, MBBS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal