ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Prospective Study on USS Assessment of Pelvic Structures in 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy Versus Delivery Outcome (PLUSSMODEL)

B

Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust

Status

Completed

Conditions

Pelvic Floor Disorders
Pregnancy

Treatments

Procedure: ultrasound
Procedure: uroflow-meter

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02265081
U1111-1162-7720

Details and patient eligibility

About

The proposed study is to evaluate if there are specific factors in the pelvic floor functional anatomy which can predict the ability of having a vaginal birth after caesarean section.

Physical characteristics of the soft tissue in the female pelvis play an important role in successful vaginal delivery. A "tight" or less distensible pelvic floor muscles may influence mode of delivery, leading to poor labour progression and by compressing foetal head produce CTG abnormality such as decelerations, both resulting in caesarean delivery.

One of the main structures of the pelvic floor, the puborectoalis muscle, facilitates the passage of fetal head through the birth canal by stretching and distending. Therefore distensibility of the female pelvic floor influences mode of delivery.

Three hundred patients, in the third trimester of pregnancy, will be recruited via the antenatal clinics to minimize any disruption in their pregnancy care provision. Eligible participants are pregnant women who had either one or no vaginal births, or one caesarean section and who can give an informed consent and maintain their autonomy regarding mode of delivery with understanding of the forthcoming study results. Participants will be excluded if they sustain any obstetric complications that may impede on time and mode of delivery including an emergency prelabour caesarean section.

Ultrasonographic assessment of the differences in the pelvic characteristics of these women will be used to predict a successful of trial of vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) in subsequent pregnancies. The results will be used to better inform whether there is a simple (single ultrasound assessment) that can be used to help inform women's choice regarding mode of delivery.

Results from this research could be a pioneering blueprint for further studies, as there is very little known about this topic.

Enrollment

135 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

16 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. English speaking women
  2. over 16 years old women
  3. women willing to provide written informed consent
  4. women who had either prior vaginal delivery or caesarean section or no prior birth experience

Exclusion criteria

  1. Women who cannot give an informed consent,
  2. under the age of consent,
  3. any participants whose pregnancies complicated during the antenatal period that may influence decision on time and mode of delivery that is anyone who has to undergo an emergency prelabour LSCS,
  4. nonEnglish speaking women
  5. less than 16 years old women

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

135 participants in 3 patient groups

nulliparous women
Active Comparator group
Description:
internal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
Treatment:
Procedure: uroflow-meter
Procedure: ultrasound
parous women
Experimental group
Description:
those who had vaginal delivery in the past; internal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
Treatment:
Procedure: uroflow-meter
Procedure: ultrasound
parous women - VBAC
Experimental group
Description:
those with previous LSCS and no vaginal births; internal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
Treatment:
Procedure: uroflow-meter
Procedure: ultrasound

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems