A ProspectiveTrial Using Video Images in Advance Care Planning in Hospitalized Seriously Ill Patients With Advanced Cancer
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
The purpose of this study is to compare the decision making of hospitalized subjects with advanced cancer having a verbal discussion about CPR compared to subjects using a video.
Full description
Aim 1: To recruit 150 subjects with advanced cancer admitted to the inpatient oncology ward with an overall prognosis of one year or less and randomly assign these subjects to:
- a video visually depicting CPR preferences or
- the current standard of care without the use of video (control).
Hypothesis 1: It is feasible to recruit and randomize 150 hospitalized subjects with advanced cancer and an overall prognosis of one year or less.
Aim 2: To compare the care preferences for CPR and intubation among subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to the current standard of care without the video.
Hypothesis 2: Subjects randomized to the video intervention will be significantly more likely to opt against CPR and intubation compared to those who do not see the video.
Aim 3: To compare code-status documentation in the electronic medical records between subjects randomized to the video and those who are receiving the current standard of care without the video.
Hypothesis 3: Subjects randomized to the video are more likely to have their code status documented in the electronic medical records compared to those who do not see the video.
Aim 4: To compare the decisional conflict of subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to the current standard of care without the video.
Hypothesis 4: When compared to subjects randomized to the current standard of care, subjects in the video intervention group will have lower decisional conflict (lower decisional conflict scores) when asked to choose CPR and intubation preferences.
Aim 5: To compare knowledge assessment of CPR of subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to current standard of care without the video.
Hypothesis 5: When compared to subjects randomized to the current standard of care, subjects in the video intervention group will have higher knowledge assessment scores when asked questions regarding their understanding of CPR.
Aim 6: To compare code-status (CPR, and intubation) preferences in the electronic medical record on future hospitalizations up to one year post-hospital discharge of subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to current standard of care without the video.
Hypothesis 6: Subjects randomized to the video are more likely to opt against CPR and intubation in the future compared to those who do not see the video.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Potential subjects will be identified by the research assistant. The specific eligibility criteria include:
- Over the age of 60
- The ability to provide informed consent
- The ability to communicate in English
- An established diagnosis of metastatic cancer with a prognosis of one year or less confirmed with the attending physician on service.
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Angelo Volandes, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal