Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
To compare the efficacy and safety of dapsone versus atovaquone in preventing or delaying the onset of histologically proven or probable Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts <= 200 cells/mm3 or <= 15 percent of the total lymphocyte count who are intolerant to trimethoprim and/or sulfonamides.
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), which is effective for secondary PCP prophylaxis, is associated with allergic manifestations and side effects that limit its use. Patients who are intolerant of TMP/SMX require an effective alternative. Dapsone and atovaquone have both shown promise as PCP prophylactic agents.
Full description
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), which is effective for secondary PCP prophylaxis, is associated with allergic manifestations and side effects that limit its use. Patients who are intolerant of TMP/SMX require an effective alternative. Dapsone and atovaquone have both shown promise as PCP prophylactic agents.
Patients are randomized to receive either dapsone or atovaquone daily, with follow-up at the clinic every 4 months.
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Concurrent Medication: Strongly recommended:
Patients must have:
NOTE:
Prior Medication:
Allowed:
Exclusion Criteria
Co-existing Condition:
Patients with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded:
Concurrent Medication:
Excluded:
Patients with the following prior conditions are excluded:
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal