A Randomized Controlled Trial on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children With Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 4

Conditions: Renal Scars; Pyelonephritis

Treatments: Drug: Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT00382343

RC 35/00

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36 months with vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR).

Full description

In recent years, the effectiveness of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) has been intensely discussed. The question is not only whether antibiotics are effective in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), but also whether they alter the natural history of disease and help to prevent the appearance of new kidneys scars. The evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis is scanty: randomised controlled trials (RCT) published until now are poorly designed and carried out in very heterogeneous samples of children, i.e. spanning from 6 months to 14-18 years of age and pooling patients with and without VUR. A recently updated Cochrane Systematic Review concludes that high quality RCTs are needed to determine the effectiveness of long-term antibiotics for the prevention of UTIs in susceptible children. Moreover, the presence of VUR has not been firmly shown to be a risk factor for recurrence of pyelonephritis, and a direct association between VUR and the presence of scars or the appearance of new scars has not been demonstrated; there is just an association between VUR of grade IV-V and prenatal renal dysplasia, almost exclusively in male infants. In spite of this uncertainty, several practice guidelines recommend long term antibiotic prophylaxis in children with different degrees of VUR.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36 months with VUR.

Comparison: In a multicentre trial, 100 patients with VUR diagnosed with cystourethrography after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis or for prenatal evidence of pyelectasia will be assigned randomly to receive prophylaxis or not. Randomization will be carried out using a centralized minimization procedure to balance for sex, age group and VUR grade.

Enrollment: 96 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 1 day to 30 months old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• presence of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) grade II, III or IV, based on the International Classification, mono or bilateral, diagnosed between one day and 30 months of age after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis, or after birth during diagnostic procedures planned as a consequence of prenatal ultrasonographic evidence of pyelectasia.

Exclusion criteria

• previous episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI), even if only suspected (e.g. an episode of fever treated with antibiotics without performing urine culture);
• VUR grade I, because of the high probability of rapid spontaneous resolution;
• VUR grade V, as requested by the Technical Scientific Committee, concerned by the high incidence of associated renal dysplasia;
• recurrence of acute pyelonephritis before the first dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan, if this was positive for scars.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

96 participants in 2 patient groups

sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

Experimental group

Description:

Antibiotic prophylaxis with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim \[1-2 mg/kg trimethoprim and 5-10 mg/kg sulfamethoxazole once daily\]; in case of intolerance (leucopoenia) and for children younger than 6 months: nitrofurantoin \[2 mg/kg once daily\]

Treatment:

Drug: Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim

No prophylaxis

No Intervention group