ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Randomized Trial Measuring the Effect of Decision Aids on Patients' Satisfaction, Conflict of Decision-making and Clinical Outcome

Mass General Brigham logo

Mass General Brigham

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Distal Radius Fractures
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis
Trigger Finger
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Treatments

Behavioral: Decision Aid

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01693094
2012P002281

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators plan a prospective randomized controlled study that compares the treatment decisions made by patients who receive decision aids, as compared to patients treated with usual care and the American Society for Surgery of the Hand brochures. The investigators expect to enroll 126 patients.

Full description

Decision aids are tools that help patients participate in making decisions by providing detailed, specific, and personalized information regarding the benefits and risks of various potential treatment options for a diagnosis. Decision aids can reduce the level of uncertainty and mental anguish associated with choosing a particular course of action, i.e. 'decisional conflict'. The most common manifestations of decisional conflict include verbalized uncertainty about choices or undesired consequences of alternatives, vacillation between choices, and delayed decision making.

Besides the advantages of decision aids in the process of decision-making, the literature is not conclusive about the effect of decision aids on patient satisfaction. Of the 86 randomized controlled trials identified by authors Stacey et al., eleven studies measured satisfaction. Of these, four studies reported that people exposed to decision aids had higher satisfaction with their choice compared to usual care, and the remaining seven reported no statistically significant difference.

Studies that have directly investigated the effect of decision aids in orthopaedic practice are limited and further study is necessary to determine the best way to implement decision aids in a clinical orthopedic practice. 7-12 Randomized trials evaluating the impact of decision aids on patient knowledge, decisional conflict, satisfaction, and outcomes may have substantial impact in hand surgery where most treatments are elective and address quality of life.

Enrollment

126 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and above

  • Diagnosis of moderate or severe:

    2.) Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) 5.) Trigger Finger (TF)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with previous interventions for CTS or TF
  • Inability to complete enrollment forms due to any mental status or language problems (e.g. dementia, head injury, overall illness).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

126 participants in 2 patient groups

No decision aid
No Intervention group
Description:
One cohort will not receive the decision aid, and instead will receive only a brochure as standard treatment.
Decision Aid
Active Comparator group
Description:
One cohort will receive a decision aid.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Decision Aid

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems