ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Semi-structured Interview PACIENTE Improves Communication With Family Members at the Intensive Care Unit

F

Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud

Status

Completed

Conditions

Quality of Life
Communication

Treatments

Behavioral: Training

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02336893
DI-I-0734-13

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to assess whether a formal training strategy using an interview PACIENTE may improve physician's skills and quality of communication with family members at the ICU.

Full description

Introduction: Effective communication with physicians is an important factor for families at intensive care unit. Although physicians should have adequate communication skills, training programs are not available that would enable them to enhance this competence. Formal training using a semi-structured interview to improve skills and quality of communication was provided to physicians in charge of supplying information to families at the intensive care unit (ICU).

Objective: To assess whether a formal training strategy using an interview PACIENTE may improve physician's skills and quality of communication with family members at the ICU.

Methods: A pre- and post- intervention study was designed for a university hospital mixed ICU (medical and surgical). Training was provided to 34 resident physicians in charge of giving information to families at the ICU using interview PACIENTE. The interview was done conjointly with participation in simulated difficult clinical cases with actors posing as family members.

Patient registries: Family satisfaction was assessed with a validated survey, FS-ICU 24, in 122 and 123 family members pre- and post-intervention training, respectively, on the fourth day after patient admission to the ICU. The surveys were identified with consecutive numbers and not collected data that would allow subsequent identification of patients or their families. After the intervention, structures of interviews were monitored with checklists designed for this purpose. The meetings were always in the same place for this activity.

The surveys were answered on paper and the data included in an SPSS database by one of the researchers. Single questions in the 24-FS-ICU survey were analyzed according to the author's suggestions with minor modifications. Scores from items 1-6 in the published survey were transformed to scores from 0 to 100. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any score differences between pre- and post-interventions. Differences of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The sample size was calculated to be 122 participants for pre-intervention and 122 participants for post-intervention to detect α coefficient of 0.05 and with a power of 0.90. The survey was performed in the waiting room and questionnaires were collected immediately; thus, there were no missing questionnaires.

Enrollment

245 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • That consented to participate in the satisfaction survey
  • That whom had been in the ICU for 72 h.

Exclusion criteria

  • Family members with language barriers (requiring assistance to answer a question in writing)
  • Previous ICU admission within the study period
  • Patient's death by the fourth day of admission
  • Proved reasons for risk of judicial proceedings.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

245 participants in 2 patient groups

Pre-intervention
No Intervention group
Description:
Family members of patients admitted to the ICU from August to December 2013 that consented to participate in the satisfaction survey and had been in the ICU for 72 h.
Post-intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Family members of patients admitted to the ICU from March to August 2014 that consented to participate in the satisfaction survey and had been in the ICU for 72 h.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Training

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems