Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus physicians choice standard of care chemotherapy in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after prior exposure to at least two HER2-directed therapies for advanced disease.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
diagnosis of HR+, HER2+ breast cancer (BC)
unresectable locally advanced recurrent BC or metastatic BC
adequate tumor tissue available prior to randomization
measurable and/or non-measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
previously received:
must have received a taxane in any disease setting
may have received any endocrine therapy (excluding fulvestrant)
have postmenopausal status due to surgical / natural menopause or chemical ovarian suppression
performance status (PS) of 0 to 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% or higher at baseline
adequate organ function
negative serum pregnancy test at baseline (within 14 days prior to randomization) and agree to use medically approved precautions to prevent pregnancy during the study and for 12 weeks following the last dose of abemaciclib if menopause induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or radiation
discontinued previous localized radiotherapy for palliative purposes or for lytic lesions at risk of fracture at least 2 weeks prior to randomization and recovered from the acute effects of therapy
discontinued all previous therapies for cancer (including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and endocrine therapy), except trastuzumab, for at least 21 days for myelosuppressive agents or 14 days for nonmyelosuppressive agents prior to receiving study drug, and recovered from the acute effects of therapy
are able to swallow capsules
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
237 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal