Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Full description
The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) needles in transseptal puncture have been well established through several comparative clinical studies. In foreign countries, RF needles have already been used for transseptal puncture for more than 20 years since the FDA approval of the first RF Needle. However, in Korea, despite the fact that it has been approximately 30 years since the initiation of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the treatment of arrhythmia, only the conventional mechanical needles have still been available after authorization for transseptal puncture that is the key for the treatment of cardiac disorders such as mitral stenosis as well as a part of RFCA for the treatment of arrhythmia.
Therefore, this study aims to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis, and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
≥ 18 years of age
Diagnosed with one of the following cardiac disorders as shown in the medical record:
[Symptomatic arrhythmia]
"Atrial fibrillation" diagnostics (including paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation)
Diagnostic criteria: atrial fibrillation lasting ≥ 30 seconds as a result of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or single-lead ECG
ECG feature: irregular R-R interval, lack of visible P waves, irregular atrial activation
Symptoms: fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, chest discomfort, sleep disorders, mental stress
Type:
"Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics
= Clinical feature: The heart beats regularly 150 to 200 times per minute; the start and end of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are clearly recognizable; these occur unexpectedly and stop abruptly.
"Ectopic Atrial Rhythm Tachycardia" diagnostics
= Clinical feature: Heart rhythm of less than 250 beats per minute; morphologic difference from P waves in the sinus rhythm; P waves that precede QRS waves are identifiable.
"Ventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics = Clinical feature: Wide QRS waves appear in succession with a rapid ventricular rate of ≥ 100 beats per minute; the patients is diagnosed with persistent ventricular tachycardia if tachycardia persists for ≥ 30 seconds but with non-persistent ventricular tachycardia if not applicable.
"Arrhythmia requiring left atrial access, including left atrial appendage occlusion, in the left atrium" diagnostics = Clinical feature: moderate or higher risk of stroke, risk of bleeding, or contraindication to anticoagulation therapy
[Symptomatic mitral stenosis]
-"Mitral Stenosis requiring percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty through left atrial access" diagnostics
Understood this clinical study and voluntarily signed the informed consent form (ICF)1
Exclusion criteria
[For symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis] If any of the following applies, you cannot participate in this clinical trial.1,26,37,45,46
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
70 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Eunji shin
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal