ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Study to Evaluate Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

C

Centre Recherche Cardio Vasculaire Alpes

Status

Completed

Conditions

Fractional Flow Reserve
Coronary Artery Stenosis

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: FFR
Diagnostic Test: FFR DWP

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04970082
2021-A00947-34

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a randomized, non-inferiority, crossover investigation comparing the Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) versus standard method to measure Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in subjects with FFR indications.

All subjects requiring on a clinical basis a pressure wire assessment of coronary artery stenosis(es) will be eligible to take part in the study.

Full description

Pressure wire-based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) has become the reference standard index of haemodynamic significance to guide revascularisation of intermediate coronary artery lesions.

The FFR measurement determines the ratio of the maximum blood flow that can be achieved in a diseased or narrowed coronary artery to the maximum blood flow in a normal coronary artery. This ratio represents the potential decrease in distal coronary flow relative to coronary stenosis.

FFR is easily measured during routine coronary angiography using a pressure wire to calculate the ratio of coronary pressure distal to a stenosis or diseased segment to aortic pressure under conditions of maximum myocardial hyperemia. An FFR of 1.0 is widely accepted as normal. An FFR of less than 0.80 is generally considered to be associated with coronary ischemia and widely accepted in favor of revascularization rather than conservative management.

The current standard method of measuring FFR is to insert a pressure wire into the coronary artery while the hyperaemic agent, usually adenosine, is delivered by intracoronary bolus or continuous intravenous injection.

Administration of adenosine may cause bradycardia and thus cause patient vagal discomfort. Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) can potentially overcome the drawbacks of the standard method when measuring FFR. Indeed, DWP allows to transmit an electrical current from the external pacemaker to the heart thanks to metallic FFR guidewire already used, and thus prevent bradycardia.

In addition, there are some absolute contraindications to the use of Adenosine such as 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, untreated sinus dysfunction or long QT syndrome ...DWP could allow this highly recommended diagnostic tool (1A) to be used in this patient population.

The investigators would therefore like to determine if the measurement of FFR by DWP would be non-inferior to the standard method to obtain precise FFR values and maximize patient's comfort.

Enrollment

150 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligible patient for coronary angiography.

Inclusion Criteria:

The patients included in the study must meet the following inclusion criteria :

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients with FFR indications
  • Has given consent to undergo diagnostic coronary procedure
  • Patients able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Patients with Social Security coverage

Prior to randomisation: Angiography demonstrates at least one coronary stenosis in an artery, requiring FFR measurement for physiological assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

The patients included in the study should not meet the following inclusion criteria :

  • Contraindications to use sensitivity to Adenosine or any of its excipients
  • Technically inaccessible stenosis(es)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patients under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship
  • Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

150 participants in 2 patient groups

FFR followed by FFR-DWP (investigation)
Experimental group
Description:
The FFR measurement is performed with the standard method first followed by the FFR measurement with the DWP method.
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: FFR
Diagnostic Test: FFR DWP
FFR-DWP (investigation) followed by FFR
Experimental group
Description:
The FFR measurement is performed with the DWP method first followed by the FFR measurement with the standard method.
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: FFR
Diagnostic Test: FFR DWP

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems