Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to learn about how well the yearly updates to the COVID-19 vaccine work in adults (age 18 years and above) with a healthy immune system (the body's cells, tissues and organs that work together to protect your body) and in children (age 6 months to 17 years).
This study will use a collection of insurance claims and state vaccine registry data called HealthVerity. All patient names and other identifying information is removed.
This study will include children who:
This study will include adults who:
This study will use the data that has already been collected, and no treatment or vaccine will be given in the study.
People who match the information above will be followed in the HealthVerity database for up to 6 months following the first day that a new COVID-19 vaccine is available. This information will be reviewed to see if any of the following happen:
The experiences of people who received a COVID-19 vaccine will be compared to the experiences of people who did not receive the vaccine. This will help to understand how well the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine works at stopping COVID-19.
Full description
Rationale and Background
On April 6, 2022, members of the United States (US) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted for the first time to update COVID-19 vaccine strain compositions from the original wildtype formulation to a formulation that better matched currently circulating variants. In a commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network Open one month later, Dr Peter Marks (director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research), Dr Janet Woodcock (principal deputy FDA commissioner) and Dr Robert Califf (FDA commissioner) argued
"Better alignment between the variant(s) covered by the vaccine and circulating variant(s) of SARS-CoV-2 might be expected to prevent a broader spectrum of disease, potentially for a longer time".
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted in each of 2022, 2023 and 2024 to recommend updated COVID-19 vaccines as authorized or approved by FDA in persons ≥ 6 months. There is therefore a need to evaluate effectiveness of these updated products on an annual basis, against a variety of health outcomes.
Research Question and Objectives
The research question for this study is "What is the real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2 formulations?"
Primary objective:
To evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 formulations in non-immunocompromised adults (age 18+) against COVID-19 related endpoints, by age, comorbid conditions of interest and adapted vaccine formulation.
Secondary objective:
To measure COVID-19 VE of BNT162b2 formulations in pediatrics (age < 18) against COVID-19 related endpoints, by age and adapted vaccine formulation.
Research Methods
Study Design
For all aims of this study, vaccination status will be measured as a time-varying exposure. Exposed person-time begins 14 days after receipt of a BNT162b2 formulation. Unexposed person-time is unvaccinated person-time, as well as 0-13 days after vaccination. The unexposed group will be further stratified by previous status.
Data from one year prior to updated formulation availability will be used as the look-back period to define patient's characteristics, clinical history, risk factors, and healthcare utilization. All available data prior to this period may be used as well.
Setting
The youngest possible age for any person in any aim of the study is 6 months old.
This protocol will be conducted among persons who have all of the following:
Variables
Primary and secondary objectives, exposure: BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, enumerated using Clinical Vaccines Administered (CVX), National Drug Code (NDC) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.
Primary and secondary objectives, outcomes: COVID-19 related endpoints:
Outpatient encounters with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1 "COVID-19"
Emergency department encounters with an ICD-10-CM code U07.1
Urgent care encounters with an ICD-10-CM code U07.1
Inpatient encounters with an ICD-10-CM code U07.1. Of note, potentially incidental findings of COVID-19, such as those during the course of a major psychiatric or physical trauma associated admission, will be excluded using previously described methodology.
Potential confounders: a diverse set of variables will be used to balance baseline characteristics between those who are vs are not vaccinated. In brief, these will include sociodemographic and clinical features known to be associated with the risk of exposure and outcome and may need to be tailored based on the structure of confounding assumed to be present.5,6 The balanced set of covariates will contain a sample where standardized mean differences (SMD) between measured confounders are ≤ 0.1.7.
Data Sources
Medical and pharmacy claims
Insurers contributing to closed claims include a mix of commercial payers, Medicare Advantage/Part C plans, and Medicaid Managed Care plans. Data elements in medical claims include patient demographic information, inpatient/outpatient visit-level information such as diagnoses, procedures, and length of stay, hospital characteristics, and medication information. Owing to the nature of claims, the data represent the final set of diagnoses over the course of the hospitalization sent to the patient's insurer for reimbursement, with diagnosis prioritization assigned by clinicians or hospital staff. Data elements in pharmacy claims include patient demographic information, NDC, date of service, dispensed quantity, and days' supply.
State vaccine registries
Since December 2020, vaccinators in many jurisdictions and states have been mandated to report COVID-19 vaccine administered to their respective state health authorities.
State registry files have unique person identifiers, vaccination event date, and CVX codes, which are unique to each vaccine.
Linkage methods between data sources
The administrative insurance claims data and the state vaccine registry data were independently tokenized using HealthVerity's tokenization software, meaning patient identifiers are passed through software to create a unique de-identified identification number for each person. Identifying information is removed by the vaccine registries before sending the data to HealthVerity for data aggregation. This process ensures Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule compliance via expert determination. The insurance claims data were then linked to the state vaccination registries via the tokenized identification number.
Study Size
This study uses retrospective deidentified data without ability to recruit to a target, sample size calculations are not applicable. The expected number of people eligible for the study is expected to be approximately 30% of a state's population, given HealthVerity's marketplace coverage. In order to maintain confidentiality as well as causal inference principles of consistency, positivity and exchangeability, outcomes, covariates and subgroups will have at least 10 people in each category for inclusion in outputs. Throughout the protocol, this is referred to as "If sample size allows".
Data Management
Claims and vaccine registry data refreshes are delivered by HealthVerity monthly. All HealthVerity structured data described above are stored within Pfizer's data infrastructure. Data are queried and analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) and/or R. The HealthVerity claims, mortality, and vaccine registries are stored as separate databases and, owing to the nature of the data use agreement, on a different server than all other enterprise-wide data. The data are only accessible to Pfizer colleagues who have been trained and approved to access Pfizer's data warehouse.
In brief, all data in the year prior to index through 6 months after index for persons who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria detailed in section 9.1 will be extracted.
Data Analysis
Data are extracted using standardized macro scripts by two experienced programmers, with all discrepancies resolved before final results delivery. Descriptive analyses will compare the distribution of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in final cohorts.
Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models will be used to estimate the hazard of each outcome of interest with time-varying exposure and time-fixed covariates, resulting in adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Detailed methodology for summary and statistical analyses of data collected in this study will be documented in a SAP, which will be dated, filed, and maintained by the sponsor. The SAP may modify the plans outlined in the protocol; any major modifications of primary endpoint definitions or their analyses would be reflected in a protocol amendment.
Quality Control
Data in HealthVerity's database are provided monthly in an electronic format. HealthVerity employs its tokenization product to match patients between different data sources with high accuracy. Each monthly delivery of data contains a quality control report, which was co-created between HealthVerity and Pfizer subject matter experts to ensure continued quality. All analyses will be performed internally and according to Pfizer analytic standards, including double programming to ensure quality control.
Limitations of the Research Methods
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The youngest possible age for any person in any aim of the study is 6 months old.
For objectives pertaining to adults, this protocol will be conducted among persons who have all of the following:
For objectives pertaining to pediatrics, this protocol will be conducted among persons who have all of the following:
1 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal