Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The work proposed herein aims to provide the first prospective, randomized comparative efficacy data between Melphalan and BEAM treatment regimen in the Multiple Myeloma (MM) patient population. The risk of such a study is deemed reasonable and ethical since: a) previous works have closely examined the safety and toxicity of the BEAM regimen and the doses to be delivered in this protocol are well below the toxicity levels; b) phase III trials of BEAM have provided reasonable data regarding the efficacy in lymphomas c) Early, retrospective data suggests that BEAM may be efficacious in MM however due to the lack of prospective controlled randomized clinical trial, there is adequate equipoise regarding its efficacy and moreover its comparative efficacy in relation to Melphalan and; D) there are known limitations in the standard-of-care for MM, Melphalan, namely, relatively low rates of complete response at the time of Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and poor progression free survival.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients who have a new diagnosis of MM according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) working criteria undergoing autologous or syngeneic hematopoietic transplantation
According to these criteria, the following must be met:
Patients must have received initial therapy for MM; at least 2 cycles with a minimum of partial response as defined by IMWG guidelines.
Age >=18, < 70years.
Karnofsky >70.
Life expectancy is not severely limited by concomitant illness based on the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) [8, 9] including:
Proficient in English
Signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
John Kaneko; Janell Duey, JD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal