ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Trial on the Effects of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Severe Emphysema. (SOLVE)

U

University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Emphysema

Treatments

Behavioral: Pulmonary rehabilitation
Device: EBV treatment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy.

Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition.

Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit).

Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves.

Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards.

Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).

Full description

Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy.

Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition.

Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit).

Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves.

Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards.

Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no major risks for the participating patients. The patients will be exposed to additional exercise capacity and physical activity measurements, 3 additional questionnaires, a CT scan of the quadriceps muscle, a DEXA scan and peripheral blood collection. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients will be exposed to a cardiac MRI or muscle and fat biopsies. Patient can directly benefit from the EBV treatment and the pulmonary rehabilitation program. Indirect benefit might be achieved, because, at a group level the investigators will learn more about this novel treatment for our severe emphysema patients and will be able to further optimize this treatment.

Enrollment

96 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • COPD.
  • FEV1 ≤45%pred AND FEV1/FVC <70%.
  • TLC >100%pred AND RV>175%pred.
  • CAT ≥18.
  • >50% emphysema destruction @-910HU.
  • >95% complete major fissure measured by quantitative CT analysis.
  • Non-smoking >6 months.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • PaCO2>8.0 kPa, or PaO2<6.0kPa.
  • 6-minute walk test <160m.
  • Significant chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, or other infectious lung disease.
  • 3 of more hospitalizations due to pulmonary infection within last 12 months before baseline assessments
  • Previous lobectomy, LVRS, or lung transplantation.
  • LVEF<45% and or RVSP>50mmHg.
  • Anticoagulant therapy which cannot be weaned off prior to procedure.
  • Patient is significantly immunodeficient.
  • Involved in other pulmonary drug studies within 30 days prior to this study.
  • Pulmonary nodule which requires intervention
  • Any disease or condition that interferes with completion of initial or follow-up assessments

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

96 participants in 3 patient groups

Group 1:PR-EBV treatment
Experimental group
Description:
Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program PRIOR to the EBV treatment
Treatment:
Device: EBV treatment
Behavioral: Pulmonary rehabilitation
Group 2: EBV treatment-PR
Experimental group
Description:
Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program AFTER the EBV treatment
Treatment:
Device: EBV treatment
Behavioral: Pulmonary rehabilitation
Group 3: EBV treatment
Active Comparator group
Description:
Only EBV treatment
Treatment:
Device: EBV treatment

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems