ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

A Unique Device for Independent Lung Ventilation

M

Medical University of Lublin

Status

Completed

Conditions

Anesthesia

Treatments

Other: independent ventilation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02786862
MULublin

Details and patient eligibility

About

Adequate blood oxygenation and ventilation/perfusion matching should be the main goal of anaesthetic and intensive care management. At present, the sole method of improving gas exchange restricted by ventilation/perfusion mismatching is independent ventilation with two ventilators. Recently, however, a unique device has been developed, enabling ventilation of independent lungs in 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 5:1 proportions. The main goal of the study was to evaluate the device's utility, precision and impact on biomechanical lung parameters during thoracic surgery under general anaesthesia with double lumen tube intubation. Secondly- to measure the gas distribution in supine and lateral decubitus position.

Full description

Anaesthetic management:

One hour before thoracic surgery, the patient-subjects received diazepam 0.15 mg kg-1 as premedication. After arriving at the operating theatre, standard monitoring system practices was applied, including heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Moreover, an intra-vein cannula was placed, and the infusion of multi-electrolytic fluid 5-10 ml kg-1 h-1 was started. After pre-oxygenation, atropine 0.5 mg and fentanyl 3 µg kg-1 were given, and the induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 5-7 mg kg-1 was started. Suxamethonium was administered for neuromuscular blockade, and bronchial intubation with a Robertshow double lumen tube was performed. The left bronchus was intubated for right lung surgery, and the right bronchus was intubated for left lung surgery. Tube placement was checked via auscultation and fiberscope. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, additional fentanyl doses were used if needed, and neuromuscular blockade was obtained with vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1. Additionally, 0.1 mg kg-1 dose of morphine was given subcutaneously for postoperative pain control. Patients were also ventilated with O2 (oxygen) and AIR (air) mixture, using the following settings: volume control intermittent positive pressure ventilation, FiO2 (oxygen fraction) 0.4, Vt (tidal volume) 6-10 ml/kg, and f (frequency) 12-15 /min. Furthermore, end tidal CO2 (carbon dioxide) was monitored due to normocapnia maintenance (4.0-5.3 kPa). At the end of surgery, intercostal blockade was brought about with 0.5% bupivacaine, with 5 ml for each nerve. Finally, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 0.04 mg kg-1 and with atropine 0.01 mg kg-1.

After anaesthesia stabilisation, the unique control system was used, called the 'tidal volume divider'. This device was placed between the anaesthetic machine and the double lumen tube of the patient. This control system enables conventional ventilation (without any intervention from the control system, as the settings are defined on the ventilator), as well as independent ventilation with division of the tidal volume between the lungs in proportions of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 5:1. It also enables PEEP (selective positive end-expiratory pressure) application to each lung. With independent ventilation, settings such as frequency, tidal volume and inspiration time are defined by ventilator, and this system only controls the direction of tidal volume to each lung (as the control system is a flow divider) by using a differential pneumatic resistor. It also enables dependent and non-dependent lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus positions. Furthermore, the system monitors the expired volume, airway pressure and dynamic compliance of each lung. This device was described and tested on mechanical lung models with a variety of lung model mechanics (compliance, resistance) and ventilation parameters (frequency, tidal volume). It was also tested clinically for its safety during our previous study. The system was invented, developed and patented by a group of Polish engineers from the Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

Enrollment

69 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA I and II patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery under general anaesthesia, with double lumen tube intubation and one lung ventilation during surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • All patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of thoracotomy, assessed as ASA III, with difficult airway conditions, kyphoscoliosis or other alterations of chest wall or severe obesity were excluded

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

69 participants in 1 patient group

Ventilation
Experimental group
Description:
Measurements were made for conventional and independent at 1:1 proportion ventilation in supine position; then independent ventilation was discontinued and patient was moved to right or left decubitus position due to left or right lung surgery. Then were made measurements for conventional anaesthetic practices and followed independent at 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 5:1 proportions ventilation routines. Constantly were monitored expired volume, peak respiratory pressure, dynamic compliance separately for each lung. Measurements covered also hemodynamic (MAP, HR) and oxygenation (SpO2). These attributes were documented at each point of the study. Subsequently, the control system was disconnected and performed typical anaesthetic procedures for thoracic surgery with a one-lung ventilation procedure.
Treatment:
Other: independent ventilation

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems