Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The investigators will compare the ablation time during pulmonary vein isolation of Ablation Index-guided high power ablation with those with conventional ablation.
Ablation time of conventional group will be used from OPTIMUM study. For secondary outcomes, acute outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation using two different strategies will be compared. During 1 year of follow-up in both groups, atrial fibrillation recurrence will be evaluated. The atrial fibrillation recurrence rate at 1 year after pulmonary vein isolation will be compared between the two groups. In addition, fluoroscopic time, procedure time, and complication rates for the high power ablation group will be compared with those with conventional power.
Full description
Ablation Index guided high power ablation will be performed in 70 patients with atrial fibrillation with prospectively and consecutively. A contact force-sensing catheter will be used. Ablation will be performed with point-by-point technique using Visitag automated annotation criteria as below;
Ablation Index(AI) target:
VISITAGTM settings
Ablation parameters are preset as below;
Acute reconnection will be analysed according to predefined segments.
Subgroup analysis will be performed according to type of AF. Data of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and persistent atrial fibrillation will be analysed separately, and investigate whether this new ablation strategy is effective in both group of patients. To compare outcomes with OPITMUM phase 2 study, the proportion of patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation would be 75% and 25%. Therefore, 53 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 17 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation will be enrolled in this study.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
70 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal