Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
230 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases will be randomly assigned to resection or thermal ablation.
Full description
Rationale: The use of thermal ablation of liver tumors is rapidly increasing. This is despite a lack of high-level evidence of the oncologic efficacy of ablation. Ablation is most often used in cases where resection is not possible, but as the technique has improved it is increasingly used as a substitute for resection. A majority of studies on ablation are hampered by selection bias. Selection bias can only be overcome in a randomized controlled trial.
Primary objective:
To compare rates of local tumor progression within 12 months in patients randomly assigned to thermal ablation or surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Secondary objectives:
Study design:
A randomized, controlled, multicenter, double-blinded non-inferiority trial.
Study population:
Two groups of 115 patients (230 in total) with colorectal liver metastasis eligible for radical treatment using EITHER resection OR ablation (not a combination).
Intervention:
Ablation of colorectal liver metastases
Control:
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Main study parameters/endpoints:
The primary endpoint of the study is local recurrence of cancer at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease free survival, health related quality of life, postoperative pain, complications, hospital stay and cost-effectiveness.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• More than 3 lung metastases where 1 is >10mm, or 1 lung metastasis >15 mm (OR: unresectable lung metastases as decided by the lung MDT meeting)
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
230 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Åsmund A Fretland, MD PhD; Bjørn Edwin, Professor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal