Accelerated Mandibular Molar Protraction: Piezocision at the Time of Molar Protraction or Later?

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Status: Completed

Conditions: Orthodontic Appliance

Treatments: Other: Piezocision

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04338789

266/216

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study was conducted to compare the rate of second molar protraction, level of Interleukin1-β in gingival crevicular fluid, periodontal health (gingival index, plaque index, and periodontal pocket depth) and root resorption in patients treated by molar protraction with piezocision performed early at the time of protraction (Group 1), piezocision performed 3 months after molar protraction (Group 2), and no piezocision molar protraction (Group 3).

Full description

Detailed Description: Thirty-five subjects who presented with bilaterally extracted mandibular first molar were selected to participate in the study. The subjects were subdivided into one of 3 groups as follows: group 1 consisted of 20 subjects /20 molars where piezocision was performed immediately before molar protraction; group 2 consisted of 20 subjects/ 20 molars where molar protraction was carried on after 3 months of molar protraction with no piezocision; group 3 consisted of 20 subjects (40 molars) where protraction was carried out with no piezocision.

After reaching 0.019X0.025" SS arch wire, NiTi coil spring was used for space closure (protraction force was 150g) attached from the lower second molar hook to the head of the mini-screw. Piezocision was performed by making 2 vertical incisions mesial and distal to the extraction space. Piezotome was inserted in the incisions previously made and bone cuts were done with a length up to mucogingival line and depth of 3 mm. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sample was obtained from the mesiogingival side of the lower second permanent molar with use of Periopaper. GCF sample was repeated 1 day, 1 week and 4 weeks after molar protraction with piezocision or with no piezocision. Periodontal parameters were measured and lower molar root resorption was assessed using Perapical radiographs.

Enrollment: 30 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 19 to 30 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age range from 19 to 30 years
• Bilaterally extracted mandibular first molar (first molar extracted more than one year ago and with a residual extraction space of more than 6 mm).
• Class 1 malocclusion where molar protraction is indicated.
• All permanent teeth are present except for the extracted mandibular first molars.
• Healthy periodontium (gingival index score ≤ 2, plaque index score ≤ 2 and probing depth < 4mm)

Exclusion criteria

• Previous orthodontic treatment
• Any systemic disease
• Smoker
• Poor Oral hygiene

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

30 participants in 3 patient groups

Group 1

Experimental group

Description:

It consisted of 20 subjects with bilateral first molar extraction space where piezocesion was performed immediately before molar protraction on the left or right side of the patient.

Treatment:

Other: Piezocision

Group 2

Experimental group

Description:

It consisted of 20 subjects with bilateral first molar extraction space where piezocesion was performed 3 months after molar protraction with no piezocision on the left or right side of the patient.

Treatment:

Other: Piezocision

Group 3

No Intervention group

Description:

It consisted of 20 subjects (40 molars) where molar protraction was performed with no piezocesion.