ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Leveling and Alignment Using Corticision

D

Damascus University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Crowding, Tooth

Treatments

Device: Traditional fixed appliance
Procedure: Corticision

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03310086
UDDS-Ortho-07-2017

Details and patient eligibility

About

This experimental study will evaluate the effect of corticision on accelerating the leveling and alignment of lower crowded incisors compared with the control untreated group using cone beam computed tomography.

The study sample will consist of 26 patients with less than 6 mm crowding. The sample will be allocated randomly into two experimental groups.

The brackets and passive SS wire will be applied with radiographic metal guides between each tooth to allow for accurate corticision site 2 mm below the gingival papilla and to prevent tooth roots injury. The dentoalveolar changes occurring after leveling and alignment of lower anterior teeth will be evaluated using CBCT radiographs, Frequency, degree of root resorption, and the incidence of bone dehiscence will be assessed in relation to initial situation.

Full description

Crowding is the most common form of malocclusion. Different methods have been used to resolve crowding, including extraction and nonextraction. Corticision is an important methods to accelerate tooth movement in crowded cases. Cortical bone incision without flap elevation enhances turnover rate of surrounding structures and decreases the time for leveling and alignment. In orthodontics, CBCT imaging has been applied to evaluate impacted teeth and root resorption. But the data are very rare regarding the application of CBCT in tooth movement. So CBCT will be used in this research to evaluate the amount of external apical root resorption (EARR) and presence of dehiscence in the lower anterior teeth in the crowded cases. Furthermore, the duration of alignment will be compared between corticision group and non-corticision group.

Enrollment

26 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 25 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patients age 18 years or more
  • complete permanent dentition with second molars
  • crowding of less than 6 mm
  • good healthy patients without systematic diseases
  • absence of spaces in the lower dental arch
  • orthodontic treatment protocol does not required extraoral appliances, intraoral elastics, and expansion during leveling and alignment in the lower arch
  • good oral hygiene
  • absence of periodontal lesion

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities or systematic diseases
  • poor oral hygiene or periodontal lesion
  • previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Inability for brackets bonding in lower anterior teeth
  • presence of extreme skeletal discrepancy in vertical , transverse and anteroposterior relations
  • Delay rebonding of any loosing brackets for more than one week in the lower anterior teeth

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

26 participants in 2 patient groups

Traditional fixed appliance
Experimental group
Description:
Fixed orthodontic appliances will be applied for aligning and leveling of lower anterior teeth up to 19\*25 stainless steel wires using traditional brackets; American Orthodontics Master® MBT 0.022" Brackets
Treatment:
Device: Traditional fixed appliance
Fixed appliance and corticision
Experimental group
Description:
Fixed orthodontic appliances with corticison will be applied for aligning and leveling of lower anterior teeth up to 19\*25 stainless steel wires using traditional brackets; American Orthodontics Master® MBT 0.022" Brackets
Treatment:
Device: Traditional fixed appliance
Procedure: Corticision

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems