Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray; Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Digitally Printed Transfer Tray With Windows and Conventional Thermoformed Transfer Tray

Treatments: Device: 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning tray

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03585881

CEBD-CU-2018-04-18

Details and patient eligibility

About

this study was aimed to evaluate of accuracy of 3DPrinted windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide in compare to Thermoformed Transfer Tray For Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

Enrollment: 132 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 13 to 25 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Age: above 13 years.
2. Complete set of permanent teeth including second molar.
3. No sex predilection.
4. Class I Mild to moderate crowding (4-6 mm).

Exclusion criteria

1. Surface enamel defect that compromise bonding
2. No or poor patient's compliance.
3. Psychological problems.
4. Pathology at the site of intervention.
5. Insufficient crown height that contradicts bonding of brackets.
6. Labial and buccal Restorations.
7. Poor oral hygiene.
8. Severely rotated teeth

Trial design

Primary purpose: Other

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

132 participants in 2 patient groups

window bracket positioning tray

Experimental group

Treatment:

Device: 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning tray

conventional indirect boning tray

No Intervention group