Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Ridge Deficency

Treatments: Procedure: Conventional alveolar ridge splitting; Procedure: Computer guided surgical cutting guide

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03533309

152018

Details and patient eligibility

About

In patient with horizontal deficiency in alveolar ridge of the anterior maxilla, Dose computer Guided stent enhance the accuracy and clinical outcome vs conventional ridge splitting surgery????

Full description

PICO P- Horizontal deficient alveolar ridge in Anterior Maxillary Region I- Computer guided surgical cutting guide C- Conventional alveolar ridge splitting O- Clinical outcome and radiographic outcomes Primary outcome: Accuracy In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting.

In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) Secondary outcome: Thickness of buccal cortical plate In both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)

Enrollment: 14 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 16 to 55 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Partial edentulous in the aesthetic zone.
• Patient with bucco-lingual bone width is 3 mm or greater but < 6mm
• Normal alveolar bone height
• Adequate oral hygiene
• Free of soft tissue or dental pathology
• Patients accepting to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

• Patient medically compromised.
• Uncooperative patient.
• Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease.
• Patients who smoked and pregnant women
• Systemic disease directly affecting bone healing
• Atrophic ridges (1.5 mm or less)
• History of radiotherapy & treatment with bisphosphonates.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Single Group Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

14 participants in 2 patient groups

computer guided

Experimental group

Description:

Group (A): comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent. .

Treatment:

Procedure: Computer guided surgical cutting guide

conventional

Active Comparator group

Description:

Group (B) comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique

Treatment:

Procedure: Conventional alveolar ridge splitting