Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Full description
In this study we discuss linear and angular deviation of actual implant position using planning protocol C1(double scan technique) or C2 (triple scan technique) in completely edentulous patient .
Both protocols C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) indicated in completely edentulous patient and require C.T scan for patient wearing scan appliance .
In C1(double scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , two optical scan for the model with and without scan appliance.
In C2 (triple scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , CT scan for scan appliance alone .
Teeth positions in both protocols were identified by radio-opaque scan appliance .
16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol ( two groups - 8 implants in each group ) to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
16 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mostafa M El- Maghraby; Amr H El khadem
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal