Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to establish the accuracy of pedicle positioning using continuous electrical pulse during screwing. Additionally, the investigators evaluate if this maneuver can prevent neurological injury during track creation and screwing in lumbar and thoracic spine instrumentation surgery
Full description
Pedicle screw instrumentation as part of spine surgery is a recurrent technique used for most of spine surgeons. Since its description by Boucher in 1959 and its popularization later by Roy-Camille, has been considered a technique that demands great anatomy knowledge and some grade of expertise. Even in experienced hands the misplacement of pedicle screws could have an incidence of 10-40% (average of 20%). Medially misplacements during track creation and screw insertion are the most feared complications, because the anatomic relationship between medial pedicle wall and neural structures. The first attempt to use continuous electrical stimulation during pedicle track creation and screw insertion was communicated in 1997 by Welch WC, et al. In that study they used the bone impedance as a direct measurement of pedicle wall integrity; unfortunately they used inhaled anesthetics and assessed the final screw position with plain X-rays. They reported a sensibility and specificity of 98% and 99% respectively. The great limitation for this study is its assessment of screw accuracy performed by plain X-rays, now a days the best way to do it is with computed tomography (CT).
After the Welch report, a couple of studies more have used similar techniques in the thoracic spine trying to avoid neurological injuries during pedicle screw insertion, but none described the use of continuous train pulses during screwing.
The present study pretends to evaluate the final accuracy and trans-operative usefulness of the pulse train stimulation during track creation and screw insertion using intra venous anesthetic agents and CT scans to assess the integrity of pedicle walls
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ernesto E Galvan Hernandez, MD, MsC
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal