Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Aim of the work:
To compare the use of the Accuro ultrasound and a real time ultrasound guided epidural combined with the acoustic puncture assisted device to perform the epidural anesthesia Secondary aim is to compare the incidence of complications associated with each technique.
Patient's selection:
This study will be performed on 100 pregnant patients scheduled for normal vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia.
The sample size was calculated by taking success rate of conventional LOR to be 98% in the patients; assuming 80% power, with 95% confidence interval (CI) of two techniques and 30% margin of error.
The study protocol will be reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Alexandria Main University Hospitals.
A written consent will be obtained from all the patients participating in this study.
Complete history will be taken from all the patients and will be subjected to thorough examination and routine laboratory investigations. Patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups using a computer-generated program.
Group I consists of 50 patients scheduled for epidural catheter insertion using the Accuro ultrasound imaging assisted technique.
Group II consists of 50 patients scheduled for epidural catheter insertion using the real time ultrasound guided technique combined with the use of the acoustic puncture assist device (APAD) technique.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Any contraindication for epidural analgesia
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Yasser Mohamed Osman, assistant professor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal