Activated MMP-8 as Diagnostic Test for Periodontitis

Goethe University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Generalized Chronic Periodontitis

Treatments: Other: no intervention provided

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02280122

144/13

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background: Untreated periodontal disease may influence general health. However, how may a physician who is not trained in periodontal probing detect untreated periodontitis? Activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) in saliva correlates with periodontal probing parameters. Thus, sensitivity and specificity of a chair-side test for activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 to detect periodontitis was evaluated.

Methods: Thirty cases (untreated chronic periodontitis; 15 generalized moderate and 15 generalized severe) and 30 controls (probing pocket depths ≤ 3 mm, vertical probing attachment level ≤ 2 mm at < 30% of sites) were examined periodontally. Further, the activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 test was performed. The test kit becomes positive with ≥ 25 ng/ml activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in the sample.

Full description

.The hypotheses behind this study were:

• The aMMP-8 test discriminates between individuals with and without untreated generalized chronic periodontitis

Thus, sensitivity and specificity of a chair-side test for activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 to distinguish between individuals with and without untreated chronic periodontitis as well as between patients with generalized moderate and generalized severe ChP was evaluated.

Patients

A commercially available chair side test to detect increased levels of activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 was used at Dr. Matthias Mayer's dental office (Arndtstr. 14, 60325 Frankfurt am Main) in periodontally healthy individuals and patients with untreated generalized moderate chronic periodontitis (mChP) and generalized severe chronic Periodontitis (sChP).

The companies had provided 70 tests for use. During use the idea arose to retrospectively correlate test results and clinical diagnoses. Thus, a study protocol was submitted to the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main. All patients that were examined prior to the vote of the ethics committee were evaluated retrospectively. All following patients were recruited prospectively.

All patients were asked about current smoking (yes/no) and education level (basic school, high school, university). The study complied with the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Studies of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main (Application# 144/13).

Chair side test

For all periodontitis patients the activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 test was performed at least 24 hours after clinical examination. For periodontally healthy controls the test was done within a week after clinical examination. First of all patients rinsed with tap water for 30 seconds. Then they spat out the water and waited for 1 min. Now patients rinsed with 5ml of purified water for 30 seconds and spat this sample back into the test cup. Approximately 2 ml of the sampled saliva was now taken up with a syringe. After a filter was put onto the syringe 3 drops of the saliva were pressed through the filter into the ELISA kit. After 5 to 10 min the result was read from the test kit. If both the control and test stripes were visible the respective test was positive (i.e. ≥ 25 ng activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 per ml). All test results were photographed with 2fold magnification.

Statistical analysis

The patient was looked upon as statistical unit. The sensitivity and specificity of the aMMP-8 test was defined as the main outcome variables. All other parameters were control variables.

For all individuals, cigarette pack years were calculated. Group frequencies were expressed for sex, current smoking, education, and activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (positive/negative). Group means and standard deviations were calculated for age and bleeding on probing. Further, for each individual the following variables were calculated to describe the periodontal status.

Comparisons between groups for dichotomous parameters were made by χ² or Fisher's exact test and for all other parameters by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U test.

Using backward stepwise logistic regression analysis, factors should be identified that were associated with positive activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 tests.

Enrollment: 60 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• At least18 years of age
• Clinical diagnosis of generalized moderate or generalized severe ChP
• At least 5 teeth present per quadrant
• After application to the ethics committee: written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Requirement of systemic antibiotics for measures that may cause transitory bacteraemia (e.g. pocket probing)
• Nonsurgical or surgical periodontal treatment within the last 12 months prior to PerioMarker® test
• Systemic or topical subgingival antibiotics within the last 6 months prior to PerioMarker® test
• Anti-inflammatory medication (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) during the last 3 months prior to PerioMarker® test

Trial design

60 participants in 2 patient groups

gen. mod. to sev. chronic periodontitis

Description:

* Sites with probing pocket depths (PPD) ≥ 3.5 mm * Attachment loss (PAL-V) ≥ 3 mm \> 30% of sites * no Intervention provided

periodontally healthy

Description:

* PPD ≤ 3 mm * PAL-V ≤ 2 mm at \< 30% of sites * BOP \< 20% * No radiographically detectable bone loss: distance cemento-enamel junction to provided * no Intervention but aMMP-8 test

Treatment:

Other: no intervention provided