Menu

Acupuncture Versus Laser Acupuncture for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Treatments

Device: Sham laser acupuncture
Device: laser acupuncture
Other: acupuncture

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04828239
KTGH10946

Details and patient eligibility

About

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) results from the entrapment neuropathy of median nerve at the wrist, and most cases are idiopathic. So far, there are many treatments were developed (Surgical decompression, local injection of steroids, Wrist splints) but they are not fully satisfactory, other treatment modalities need to be further evaluated.

Both Acupuncture and laser acupuncture treatments for CTS have been reported. However, those studies still lack associated evidence to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture and laser acupuncture.

The object of the study is to investigate the efficacy of acupuncture compared with laser acupuncture in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Nerve conduction studies (NCS) and global symptom score (GSS) assessment will apply to measure objective changes in this randomized, controlled study.

Full description

Both manual acupuncture and laser acupuncture treatments for CTS have been reported.

Laser acupuncture (LA) is defined as the stimulation of traditional acupuncture points by using low-level intensity. Its a noninvasive treatment than acupuncture for those patients had the potential risk for infection or people involving pain or fear of needles. So far, previous studies still lack associated evidence about comparisons between laser acupuncture and manual acupuncture to evaluate their efficacy. So the investigators would like to compare the efficacy of acupuncture treatment with laser acupuncture (LA) treatment in patients with idiopathic, mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)

Enrollment

150 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

CTS diagnosis was based on the presence of at least one of the following symptoms

  1. numbness, tingling pain, or paresthesia in the median nerve distribution
  2. precipitation of these symptoms by repetitive hand activities, which could be relieved by resting, rubbing, and shaking the hand
  3. nocturnal awakening by such sensory symptoms.
  4. The diagnosis was often supported by a positive Tinel sign Confirmed by the presence of one or more of the following standard electrophysiologic criteria

(1) prolonged distal motor latency (DML) to the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (abnormal Z4.7 ms, stimulation over the wrist, 8 cm proximal to the active electrode) (2) prolonged antidromic distal sensory latency (DSL) to the second digit (abnormal Z3.1 ms;stimulation over the wrist, 14 cm proximal to the active electrode) (3) prolonged antidromic wrist-palm sensory nerve conduction velocity (W-P SNCV) at a distance of 8 cm (W-P SNCV, abnormal <45 m/s).9-

Exclusion criteria

  1. Symptoms occurring less than 3 months before the study (to exclude patients who might have spontaneous resolution of symptoms)
  2. severe CTS that had progressed to visible muscle atrophy
  3. clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of accompanying conditions that could mimic CTS or interfere with its evaluation, such as cervical radiculopathy, proximal median neuropathy, or significant polyneuropathy
  4. evidence of obvious underlying etiologic factors of CTS such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hypothyroidism (acromegaly), pregnancy, alcohol abuse or drug usage (steroids or drugs acting through the central nervous system), and suspected malignancy or inflammation or autoimmune disease documented as underlying causes of CTS
  5. cognitive impairment interfering with the subject's ability to follow instructions and describe symptoms

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

150 participants in 3 patient groups

Laser Acupuncture Group
Experimental group
Description:
Acupuncture point: PC-6 and PC-7 laser pen is vertical to the points and with the pen at a distance of 0.5- cm from the skin., every point is treated for 1 min administrated over 4 weeks (2 sessions/wk)
Treatment:
Device: laser acupuncture
Manual Acupuncture Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Acupuncture point: PC-6 and PC-7 Responses elicited: de qi sensation Manual: twirling with lifting-thrusting method stimulation Needles retained for 30 min Needle type: C\&G, gauge and size: 0.25x40mm
Treatment:
Other: acupuncture
Sham Laser Acupuncture Group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Acupuncture point: PC-6 and PC-7 Sham laser pen is vertical to the points and with the pen at a distance of 0.5- cm from the skin., every point is treated for 1 min administrated over 4 weeks (2 sessions/wk)
Treatment:
Device: Sham laser acupuncture

Trial contacts and locations

1

There are currently no registered sites for this trial.

Central trial contact

LI-FENG LIN, Bachelor; Chun-Pai Yang, PhD

Timeline

Last updated: Nov 30, 2021

Start date

Mar 10, 2021 • 4 years ago

End date

May 20, 2022 • 2 years ago

Today

May 09, 2025

Sponsor of this trial

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov