ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Adapting, Expanding and Evaluating ARCHES in Kenya

University of California San Diego logo

University of California San Diego

Status

Completed

Conditions

Reproductive Coercion
Intimate Partner Violence

Treatments

Behavioral: BCS+ (Balanced Counseling Strategy Plus)
Behavioral: ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06059196
201922S

Details and patient eligibility

About

Document evidence, via cluster randomized controlled trial, of the effectiveness of the ARCHES intervention, a brief, clinic-based counselling intervention demonstrated to reduce intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion and promote women's reproductive health, as scaled in government health facilities in Kenya, to (1) decrease unintended pregnancy, (2) increase family planning uptake and use/continuation, (3) decrease experiences of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence of women and girls aged 15 to 49 years seeking family planning services, and, to (4) improve quality of care, (5) increase gender equitable attitudes, and, (6) increase self-efficacy to provide comprehensive family planning counseling among providers trained in ARCHES.

Full description

Background: In Kenya, 17% of women have unmet need for family planning (FP) and the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) has plateaued around 45%, contributing to poor reproductive health outcomes. This includes the nearly 50% of women in Kenya who report their last pregnancy as unintended, with those experiencing gender-based violence (GBV), particularly in the forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive coercion (RC; behaviors that reduce women's ability to use contraception or otherwise prevent pregnancy), at significantly greater risk. Similar to other LMIC settings, both RC and IPV are highly prevalent in Kenya, particularly among women seeking FP and other reproductive health services (>1/3 of female FP clients). Since 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) has strongly recommended that IPV and RC be addressed within reproductive health services and, in 2018, the Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights found that RC and IPV were a significant contributor to unmet need for FP and unintended pregnancy, with greatest impacts among women and girls in LMICs. Within Kenya, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has made reduction of unintended pregnancy and gender-based violence (GBV), especially among adolescents, a primary objective. Despite this need and guidance, no clinic-based intervention models outside of the U.S. (apart from one, ARCHES) have demonstrated efficacy to improve FP uptake/use and reduce IPV or RC thereby reducing unintended pregnancy.

Intervention Description: ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings) is a brief, clinic-based intervention delivered by family planning providers aiming to: 1) Increase women's and girls' ability to use family planning in the face of reproductive coercion, facilitating women's voluntary family planning uptake and continued use without interference, 2) Provide a safe and supportive environment for IPV disclosure and subsequent referral to support services, and 3) Educate and support providers to improve quality of care related to family planning counseling, including addressing reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence.

Objective: The objective of this study is to generate evidence and learnings on scaling integrated family planning services (including family planning, reproductive coercion, and intimate partner violence) in public sector health facilities in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya via adaptation and implementation of ARCHES, in partnership with the Kenya MOH.

Methodology: A cluster randomized controlled trial paired with concurrent implementation science assessments will test effectiveness of the ARCHES model that has been adapted for scale by the Kenya MOH. Female family planning clients aged 15-49 years at selected sites will complete baseline surveys (immediately prior to receiving care), immediately post-visit exit surveys, and 6-month follow-up surveys. Family planning providers trained in ARCHES will complete pre-training, post-training, and 3-month follow-up surveys to assess changes in gender-equitable attitudes and self-efficacy to address issues of violence among their clients. Costs associated with the scale-up strategy will be tracked and utilized in combination with results of the effectiveness trial to assess total cost and cost-effectiveness of ARCHES.

Enrollment

3,928 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

15 to 49 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All eligibility criteria based on self-report.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Seeking family planning services at a selected study facility
  • Aged 15-49 years old
  • Female
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Able to speak and understand English, Kiswahili, or Kalenjin
  • Able to provide a safe phone number at which they can be recontacted for follow-up
  • Not planning to move out of the area in the coming 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sterilized at baseline
  • Pregnant at baseline

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

3,928 participants in 2 patient groups

Control - Standard contraceptive counseling
Active Comparator group
Description:
Standard contraceptive counseling, includes provider training on standard BCS+ counseling protocol and use of a companion mobile application to guide counseling
Treatment:
Behavioral: BCS+ (Balanced Counseling Strategy Plus)
Intervention - Integrated contraceptive counseling
Experimental group
Description:
Integrated contraceptive counseling, includes provider training on ARCHES integrated in BCS+ counseling protocol and use of a companion mobile application to guide counseling
Treatment:
Behavioral: ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings)
Behavioral: BCS+ (Balanced Counseling Strategy Plus)

Trial contacts and locations

24

Loading...

Central trial contact

Erin Pearson, PhD; Jasmine Uysal, MPH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems