ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Adapting Group PM+ for Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants in Colombia

T

The New School

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Mental Health Wellness 1

Treatments

Behavioral: Group Problem Management Plus (PM+)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05477355
GR20920

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is a type 2 hybrid implementation design, which aims to evaluate the utility and effectiveness of an intervention while simultaneously assessing implementation outcomes, such as adoption, fidelity, and maintenance. The aim is to compare participant level outcomes when the intervention is delivered by facilitators that are trained and supervised by psychologists versus by lay-supervisors. Group PM+ will be delivered to participants in two phases: first, with high levels of technical support through intensive training and supervision by mental health professionals and a second phase with routine service delivery and supervision. Non-specialist community members who are trained and supervised by psychologists to deliver PM+ as part of Phase 1 will be trained to become supervisors and train and support a cohort of new non-specialist facilitators for Group PM+ delivery in Phase 2. This model employs a train-the-trainers model to replicate routine service delivery especially in settings where mental health specialists may not be available to provide robust technical support and supervision to lay PM+ facilitators. The aim is to compare effectiveness and implementation outcomes of Group PM+ when delivered within routine care, to identify best practices for implementation, and ultimately, to shorten the time lag between intervention research and routine uptake.

Full description

This study is a type 2 hybrid implementation design, which aims to evaluate the utility and effectiveness of an intervention while simultaneously assessing implementation outcomes, such as adoption, fidelity, and maintenance. The aim is to compare participant level outcomes when the intervention is delivered by facilitators that are trained and supervised by psychologists versus by lay-supervisors. Group PM+ will be delivered to participants in two phases: first, with high levels of technical support through intensive training and supervision by mental health professionals and a second phase with routine service delivery and supervision. Non-specialist community members who are trained and supervised by psychologists to deliver PM+ as part of Phase 1 will be trained to become supervisors and train and support a cohort of new non-specialist facilitators for Group PM+ delivery in Phase 2. This model employs a train-the-trainers model to replicate routine service delivery especially in settings where mental health specialists may not be available to provide robust technical support and supervision to lay PM+ facilitators. The aim is to compare effectiveness and implementation outcomes of Group PM+ when delivered within routine care, to identify best practices for implementation, and ultimately, to shorten the time lag between intervention research and routine uptake.

This research design offers a few points of comparison:

  1. change in primary and secondary outcomes at 1-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up amongst participants that receive Group PM+ with research support (Phase 1) compared to those that receive the intervention with standard care and implementation (Phase 2), [Primary objective]
  2. differences in implementation indicators (ex. Facilitator competencies, fidelity to PM+, participant retention, cost effectiveness, adverse events, human resource involvement and more) in Phase 1 of implementation compared to Phase 2,
  3. change in primary and secondary outcomes amongst participants in the intervention arm compared to participants who do not receive the intervention during Phase 1.

Enrollment

140 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • must identify as a woman
  • over 18 years of age
  • must state that they are planning to live in Barranquilla for at least three months after the date of screening
  • moderate functional impairment as indicated by scoring greater than 16 on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for health and disability
  • moderate psychological distress as indicated by scoring greater than 2 on the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12)

Exclusion criteria

  • imminent risk of suicide and state that they have plans for attempting suicide
  • show severe cognitive impairment (e.g. severe intellectual disability or dementia) or a severe disability as identified by the Ten Questions (TQ-10)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

140 participants in 2 patient groups

Intervention Arm
Experimental group
Description:
Participants will be provided the 5 session intervention.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Group Problem Management Plus (PM+)
Wait list control arm
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants will not be provided Group PM+ in Phase 1 but will be provided the intervention after all participants in the initial intervention arm receive Group PM+.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Group Problem Management Plus (PM+)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Manaswi Sangraula, PhD; Adam Brown, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems