Added Value in Combined Use of Fusion Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography

Seoul National University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Contrast Media, Liver, Biopsy, Fusion

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: SONAZOID

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04487288

H-2003-044-1108

Details and patient eligibility

About

So far, there have been studies showing that the CEUS-grafted technique has added value in biopsy and RFA, but no studies have compared the group using only fusion and the group using CEUS+fusion. Therefore, the additional added value of CEUS will be evaluated by comparing the two groups.

Full description

Despite the rapid development of tumor markers and liver imaging, pathological confirmation is still necessary for atypical liver lesions that do not meet imaging criteria. US guided procedures are widely used as a method to identify focal lesions of the liver pathologically, and these US guided procedures have no burden on the operation, can be easily accessed, and have a lower cost than surgery. However, the frequency of pathological confirmation with this US guided procedure remains at around 90%. In order to increase this probability, a technique for fusion of liver CT/MRI and US has been widely used in recent years, and this allows accurate targeting of small lesions through structures seen in CT and MR. Through the fusion technique, the biopsy success rate for focal lesions can be increased to 94.4%. However, there are many cases where lesions deeply located in patients with cirrhosis are invisible, and biopsy is difficult only with fusion due to poor sonic window in patients with high BMI. To this end, a technique called contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), such as the fusion technique, was added, which is a technique that can identify tumor vascularity in real-time using second-generation contrast media. In recent studies, there are studies combining this fusion technique and CEUS technique, and the success rate of these techniques varies from 87.6% to 97.5%. Although CEUS with fusion techniques are theoretically superior to fusion only technique, the use of CEUS adds cost of contrast media and is limited in patients with side effects on contrast media. . Also, there is no study comparing the two so far, and this study intends to compare the technique combining CEUS and fusion and the technique using only fusion.

Enrollment

44 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patients scheduled for ultrasound biopsy to confirm local liver lesions
Adults over 18
Patients who underwent multi-phasic liver CT or MRI within 6 weeks prior to the procedure
Patients who understand and agree to the explanation and consent form and submit the consent form

Exclusion criteria

Non-adaptive patients with ultrasound contrast agents (eg acute respiratory failure, heart disease, egg allergy, pregnant women, lactating women)
Those who have difficulty obtaining proper liver ultrasound images A. Patient cooperation is not possible B. If it is difficult to obtain an image that is appropriate for the researcher's judgment (atrophy of the right lobe of the liver, a bowel is located between the liver and the abdominal wall, etc.)