Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will examine the effects of 4 months of aerobic interval training versus continuous aerobic training on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and novel plasma protein biomarkers in patients with resistant hypertension. In addition, we will measure ABP after a training cessation period of 3 months (i.e., 7 months follow-up). A randomized controlled trial will be performed including two exercise groups and a control group: a) moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT); b) moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT); c) usual care. MIIT could represent a superior training modality that exceeds the benefits of MICT in patients with resistant hypertension.
Full description
Hypertension is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and its high prevalence remains a worldwide concern. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recognized in the diagnosis and management of hypertension, and can control blood pressure better than clinic assessment. Different studies have examined the effects of aerobic training on ABP in patients with hypertension, but the effects of moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on ABP and novel plasma protein biomarkers that could potentially serve to identify cardiovascular risk, have not yet been examined in patients with resistant hypertension.To fill this gap, our aims are to determine the effects of MIIT and MICT for 4 months on ABP (primary endpoint), and on proteomic biomarkers (secondary endpoints) in patients with resistant hypertension. In addition, we will measure ABP after a training cessation period of 3 months (i.e., 7 months follow-up). A total of 72 participants will be randomly divided into three groups: the first group (n=24) will perform MIIT, the second group (n=24) will perform MICT, and the third control group (n=24) will maintain usual care for 4 months. All will receive usual care for 7 months, with the structured physical exercise as the only relevant change in the intervention groups.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
72 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Roberto Gómez Valea
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal